Buried Sphere Detection Using a Synthetic Aperture Sonar

This paper presents observations of a buried sphere detected with a low-frequency (5-35-kHz) synthetic aperture sonar (SAS). These detections were made with good signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at both above and below the critical grazing angle. The raw data for the below-critical-grazing angle detection shows that the acoustic penetration is skewed by the 29deg offset of the ripple field relative to the sonar path. This observed skew is in agreement with T-matrix calculations carried out to model penetration into the bottom via ripple diffraction. Additionally, measured SNRs over different frequency bands are compared to predictions made using both first- and second-order perturbation theory for ripple diffraction. Both the data and the models indicate a peak detection region around 25 kHz for the environmental conditions present during the test. These results confirm that ripple diffraction can play a critical role in long range (subcritical angle) buried target detection.

[1]  Joseph L. Lopes,et al.  Observations of anomalous acoustic penetration into sediment at shallow grazing angles. , 1996 .

[2]  Houston,et al.  Synthetic array measurements of acoustical waves propagating into a water-saturated sandy bottom for a smoothed and a roughened interface , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Kerry W. Commander,et al.  Detection of buried targets using a synthetic aperture sonar , 2002 .

[4]  D. Jackson,et al.  Mid- to High-Frequency Acoustic Penetration and Propagation Measurements in a Sandy Sediment , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Darrell R. Jackson,et al.  High-frequency subcritical acoustic penetration into a sandy sediment , 2002 .

[6]  David William Hawkins,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging algorithms : with application to wide bandwidth sonar , 1996 .

[7]  D. Tang.  Fine-scale measurements of sediment roughness and subbottom variability , 2004 .

[8]  Williams,et al.  Modeling of subcritical penetration into sediments due to interface roughness , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  E. Thorsos,et al.  Utilizing High-Frequency Acoustic Backscatter to Estimate Bottom Sand Ripple Parameters , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[10]  Schmidt,et al.  Mechanisms for subcritical penetration into a sandy bottom: experimental and modeling results , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Eric I. Thorsos,et al.  Shallow grazing angle sonar detection of targets buried under a rippled sand interface , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[12]  Fine-Scale Volume Heterogeneity in a Mixed Sand/Mud Sediment off Fort Walton Beach, FL , 2010, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[13]  Williams,et al.  Acoustic scattering by a three-dimensional elastic object near a rough surface , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Chester D. Loggins,et al.  Target strength of liquid‐filled spheres , 1983 .

[16]  J. Lopes,et al.  Subcritical detection of an elongated target buried under a rippled interface , 2004, Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600).

[17]  D. Jackson,et al.  Acoustic Backscattering From a Sand and a Sand/Mud Environment: Experiments and Data/Model Comparisons , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[18]  D. Jackson,et al.  Acoustic backscattering experiments in a well characterized sand sediment: data/model comparisons using sediment fluid and Biot models , 2002 .