Measuring effectiveness of safety programmes in the Thai construction industry

Some safety programmes are more effective than others in improving safety performance at the project level. The effectiveness of safety programmes was evaluated by studying 70 construction projects in the Thai construction sector, examining the relationship between their actual status and associated site safety performance. The actual status was assessed by using an evaluation tool developed in compliance with Thai safety legislation and validated by safety experts. Safety performance was assessed by using reactive and proactive measures. Particularly, the accident rate was used as a reactive indicator, while the unsafe act index and the unsafe condition index were used as proactive indicators. The results demonstrated that safety performance was influenced by the nature of implemented safety programmes. First, safety programmes which positively affect accident rates include accident investigations, jobsite inspections, control of subcontractors and safety incentives. Secondly, five programmes, namely jobsite inspections, accident investigations, job hazard analysis, safety committees and safety record keeping, were found to have the most contributions to fewer unsafe acts. And thirdly, accident investigations, jobsite inspections, job hazard analysis, safety inductions and safety auditing were the most effective programmes in reducing unsafe conditions.

[1]  Jeremy W. Stranks,et al.  The Handbook of Health and Safety Practice , 1994 .

[2]  A. Mills,et al.  Measuring the occupational health and safety performance of construction companies in Australia , 2001 .

[3]  Linda M. Goldenhar,et al.  Health and safety training in a sample of open-shop construction companies , 2001 .

[4]  Stuart D. Anderson,et al.  Strategies for Achieving Excellence in Construction Safety Performance , 1996 .

[5]  S. Siriruttanapruk,et al.  Occupational health and safety situation and research priority in Thailand. , 2004, Industrial health.

[6]  David L. Goetsch,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health for Technologists, Engineers, and Managers , 1998 .

[7]  C. H. Lawshe A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[8]  Harold C. Jacobs Accident Prevention and OSHA , 1973 .

[9]  Allan St John Holt,et al.  Principles of construction safety , 2001 .

[10]  H Laitinen,et al.  The validity of the TR safety observation method on building construction. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  K. Ringen,et al.  Safety and health in the construction industry. , 1995, Annual review of public health.

[12]  Simon Smith,et al.  Safety hazard identification on construction projects , 2006 .

[13]  Robert D. Peterson,et al.  The Complete Guide to OSHA Compliance , 1995 .

[14]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking Organizational Safety Culture in Construction , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel Fong,et al.  Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites , 1999 .

[16]  Patrick A. Michaud Accident Prevention and OSHA Compliance , 1995 .

[17]  Tyler Kress,et al.  Cost ControlInjury & Cost Control Safety Program Elements in Construction Which ones best prevent injuries and control related workers ’ compensation costs ? , 2004 .

[18]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  Non-structural fuzzy decision support system for evaluation of construction safety management system , 2002 .

[19]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  Effectiveness of safety management strategies on safety performance in Hong Kong , 1998 .

[20]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Factors That Influence Safety Performance of Specialty Contractors , 2003 .