Assessing patient outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of nurse‐led follow‐up for women with breast cancer – have relevant and sensitive evaluation measures been used?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore how interventions using nurse-led follow-up in breast cancer care have been evaluated with a focus on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. BACKGROUND As part of the advancement of breast care, nurse-led follow-up is increasingly used as an alternative to routine hospital follow-up in outpatient clinics. There is evidence suggesting that patients appear to be satisfied with the nurse-led follow-up, but there is a lack of evidence of whether this perception equates to patients' satisfaction with the model of physician-led follow-up. DESIGN Systematic review. METHOD Three databases were searched, and 29 RCT were initially screened. Finally, 13 articles were critically appraised. Searches included articles between 2005-2013. The quality of appraisal assessment was inspired by the GRADE system. RESULTS The results show that there are many different instruments used when evaluating nurse-led follow-up, which makes it difficult to compare the studies. Several of the studies used QoL as an outcome measure; this is a broad concept that includes several aspects ranging from social role and psychosocial issues to symptoms and therefore difficult to use as an outcome measure. Only two of the studies made any cost-effective analyses, and the results are hard to interpret. CONCLUSIONS Nurse-led follow-up can potentially result in better continuity of care and the availability of more time to provide psychosocial support and address patients' information needs. However, more well-conducted research is needed before equivalence to physician-led follow-up can be assessed in terms of survival, recurrence, patient well-being and cost-effectiveness. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Results from well-conducted evaluation studies of nurse-led services based on theory are needed so that relevant interventions can be implemented in clinical practice. There is a need to in future studies include cost-effectiveness analyses to compare nurse-led services with other types of follow-up.

[1]  M. Stephenson,et al.  Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics on service delivery and clinical outcomes in adults with chronic ear, nose and throat complaints: a systematic review , 2016, JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports.

[2]  P. Francis,et al.  Impact of a novel nurse-led prechemotherapy education intervention (ChemoEd) on patient distress, symptom burden, and treatment-related information and support needs: results from a randomised, controlled trial. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  P. Lambin,et al.  Nurse-led telephone follow-up and an educational group programme after breast cancer treatment: results of a 2 × 2 randomised controlled trial. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[4]  P. Lambin,et al.  Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[5]  P. Lambin,et al.  Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[6]  S. Brearley,et al.  Effectiveness of a home care nursing program in the symptom management of patients with colorectal and breast cancer receiving oral chemotherapy: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Dunn,et al.  Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of hospital versus telephone follow‐up after treatment for breast cancer , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. , 2009, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[10]  Malcolm Campbell,et al.  Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Myriam Skrutkowski,et al.  Impact of a pivot nurse in oncology on patients with lung or breast cancer: symptom distress, fatigue, quality of life, and use of healthcare resources. , 2008, Oncology nursing forum.

[12]  K. Lockhart,et al.  Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Transition from treatment to survivorship: effects of a psychoeducational intervention on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. , 2007, Oncology nursing forum.

[14]  T. Cooke,et al.  Alternative methods of follow up in breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  J. Bergh,et al.  Individual Psychosocial Support for Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Study of Nurse Versus Psychologist Interventions and Standard Care , 2007, Cancer nursing.

[16]  J. Bergh,et al.  Satisfaction, utilisation and perceived benefit of individual psychosocial support for breast cancer patients--a randomised study of nurse versus psychologist interventions. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  L. Chung,et al.  Establishing a definition for a nurse-led clinic: structure, process, and outcome. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  L. Tulman,et al.  The effect of telephone social support and education on adaptation to breast cancer during the year following diagnosis. , 2005, Oncology nursing forum.

[19]  P. Bath,et al.  Exploring nursing outcomes for patients with advanced cancer following intervention by Macmillan specialist palliative care nurses. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.