Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects

While there is a general agreement about the sensory properties of the early-latency C1 (P/N80) and P1 components of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the literature is not consistent about the timing of modulatory attention effects at an early sensory stage for either space- or object-based stimulus features. The aim of this study was to investigate whether inter-individual differences in VEP morphology might affect the nature and polarity of amplitude changes via selective visual attention. EEG was recorded in 20 right-handed individuals while they viewed drawings of familiar objects presented slightly lateralized and performed a categorization task. It consisted in paying attention and responding to a conjunction of space and object features. On the basis of VEP morphology, and independently of task factors, subjects were subdivided in two groups: one group exhibited a prominent N80 and the other a prominent P80 in the same latency range from the same electrode sites. RTs to targets were identical in the two groups, suggesting that morphology was independent of task-related factors. VEP morphology affected the direction and amplitude of spatial and non-spatial attention effects. While attention effects always resulted in increased positivity for the P80 group (at both the C1 and P1 levels), shape relevance was associated with enhanced N80 and P1 responses in the N80 group. These data provide evidence for an inversion of attention effects, in addition to inversion of C1 polarity, in people exhibiting negative C1 at mesial occipital sites.

[1]  F. Karayanidis,et al.  Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Xian Zhang,et al.  The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  W. Skrandies.  Information Processing and Evoked Potentials: Topography of Early and Late Components , 1983 .

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Laurent Petit,et al.  Early visual evoked potentials are modulated by eye position in humans induced by whole body rotations , 2004, BMC Neuroscience.

[7]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  Knowledge of visual attributes in the right hemisphere , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  The cognitive electrophysiology of mind and brain , 2003 .

[9]  J. Leon Kenemans,et al.  Selective attention to spatial frequency: an ERP and source localization analysis , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  S. Luck,et al.  Spatio‐temporal dynamics of attention to color: Evidence from human electrophysiology , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[11]  S. Luck,et al.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[12]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  G. R Mangun,et al.  On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  F. Di Russo,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Electromagnetic Manifestations of Mind and Brain , 2003 .

[17]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[19]  A. Proverbio,et al.  ERP signs of early selective attention effects to check size. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Early involvement of the temporal area in attentional selection of grating orientation: an ERP study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  Alice Mado Proverbio,et al.  Differential activation of multiple current sources of foveal VEPs as a function of spatial frequency , 1996, Brain Topography.

[22]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  G. Mangun,et al.  ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[26]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[27]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Objects Are Highlighted by Spatial Attention , 2006 .

[28]  C J Aine,et al.  Generators of visually evoked neuromagnetic responses. Spatial-frequency segregation and evidence for multiple sources. , 1990, Advances in neurology.

[29]  W. H. Dobelle,et al.  The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. , 1974, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[31]  CHRONOTOPOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF THE PATTERN‐EVOKED RESPONSE AND BINOCULAR SUMMATION * , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  N Lesevre,et al.  CHRONOTOPOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HUMAN EVOKED POTENTIAL IN RELATION TO THE VISUAL FIELD (DATA FROM NORMAL INDIVIDUALS AND HEMIANOPIC PATIENTS) , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  A. Proverbio,et al.  The Timing of Attentional Modulation of Visual Processing as Indexed by ERPs , 2005 .