Election Control by Manipulating Issue Significance

Integrity of elections is vital to democratic systems, but it is frequently threatened by malicious actors. The study of algorithmic complexity of the problem of manipulating election outcomes by changing its structural features is known as election control. One means of election control that has been proposed is to select a subset of issues that determine voter preferences over candidates. We study a variation of this model in which voters have judgments about relative importance of issues, and a malicious actor can manipulate these judgments. We show that computing effective manipulations in this model is NP-hard even with two candidates or binary issues. However, we demonstrate that the problem is tractable with a constant number of voters or issues. Additionally, while it remains intractable when voters can vote stochastically, we exhibit an important special case in which stochastic voting enables tractable manipulation.

[1]  Curtis Menton,et al.  Normalized Range Voting Broadly Resists Control , 2010, Theory of Computing Systems.

[2]  P. Faliszewski,et al.  Control and Bribery in Voting , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[3]  Zihe Wang,et al.  Hotelling-Downs Model with Limited Attraction , 2016, AAMAS.

[4]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction , 1984 .

[5]  Svetlana Obraztsova,et al.  Real Candidacy Games: A New Model for Strategic Candidacy , 2017, AAMAS.

[6]  Michael Boss Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[7]  Michael Tomz,et al.  Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  Elections with Few Voters: Candidate Control Can Be Easy , 2014, AAAI.

[9]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting , 1993 .

[10]  Elliot Anshelevich,et al.  Approximating Optimal Social Choice under Metric Preferences , 2015, AAAI.

[11]  Jörg Rothe,et al.  Control complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: A theoretical analysis , 2015, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[12]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  A Decade of Experimental Research on Spatial Models of Elections and Committees , 1990 .

[13]  Elliot Anshelevich,et al.  Randomized Social Choice Functions under Metric Preferences , 2015, IJCAI.

[14]  Svetlana Obraztsova,et al.  Manipulating Elections by Selecting Issues , 2019, AAMAS.

[15]  Jörg Rothe,et al.  Anyone but him: The complexity of precluding an alternative , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[16]  B. Grofman,et al.  A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models , 1999 .

[17]  Toby Walsh,et al.  How Hard Is It to Control an Election by Breaking Ties? , 2013, ECAI.

[18]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Maximizing a Sum of Sigmoids , 2014 .