Productivity and Profitability of Cereal-Legume Forages Vis-a-Vis Their Effect on Soil Nutrient Status in Indo-Gangetic Plains

The present study was conducted to evaluation of production potential of different forage crops commonly gown by farmers. The experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design with eight treatments and three replications at research farm of Agronomy Section, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal (Haryana). Among eight treatments, two perennial forage crops napier bajra hybrid(NBH), guinea grass cultivated sole as well as intercropping with cowpea and four seasonal fodder crops (cowpea, sorghum, baby corn and maize) were tested for their physio-morphological, biomass yield responses and economic efficiency. Experimental results showed that among the different forage crops significantly highest green as well as dry fodder yield were revealed from NBH intercropped with cowpea 63.79 and 11.95 t/ha green biomass fodder yield (GBY) and dry fodder yield respectively;which were found at par with sole NBH treatment (60.69and11.68 t/ha GBY and DFY). Amongs the different forage crops lowest GBY and DFY 33.1and 5.68 t/ha was produced by baby corn and cowpea respectively. The magnitude of the yield advantage was observed maximum and in the tune of 20.69% with guinea intercropped with cowpea against sole guinea. Highest net return was obtained from dual purpose baby corn (¹ 1.60 lakh/ha) with B: C ratio (5.26) and economic efficiency (¹ 2471/ha/day), followed by in NBH intercropped with cowpea. Based on the study, it is clearly indicated that dual purpose baby corn followed by NBH + cowpea intercropping could be feasible option for increasing the overall productivity of dairy farmers in Indo-Gangetic plains and elsewhere similar conditions prevails.

[1]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Evaluation of kharif Forage Crops for Biomass Production and Nutritional Parameters in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India , 2019, Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition.

[2]  S. Rathore,et al.  Advances in Agronomic Management for Ensuring Fodder Security in Semi Arid Zones of India- A Review , 2018 .

[3]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Productivity and profitability of legume-cereal forages under different planting ratio and nitrogen fertilization , 2018 .

[4]  R. A. Halim,et al.  Effect of intercropping of corn and soybean on dry matter yield and nutritive value of forage corn , 2016 .

[5]  H. Makkar.  Animal nutrition in a 360-degree view and a framework for future R&D work: towards sustainable livestock production , 2016 .

[6]  M. Anita,et al.  Effects of row ratios of grass fodder cowpea mixtures on the yield and quality of forages , 2015 .

[7]  S. Dong,et al.  Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system , 2011 .

[8]  Kim Johnson,et al.  Genetic control of plant organ growth. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[9]  J. Hofer,et al.  Genetic Control of Leaf Morphology: A Partial View , 2001 .

[10]  Jhansi U.P.  ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute , 2017 .

[11]  S. Biradar,et al.  ECONOMICS AND VARIETAL PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID NAPIER AND GUINEA GRASS UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS OF NORTHERN KARNATAKA , 2014 .

[12]  A. Datta,et al.  Effect of Crop Geometry and Nitrogen Levels on Quality of Baby Corn (Zea Mays L.) as Fodder , 2014 .

[13]  Gill,et al.  Effect of nutrient sources on productivity of fodder cropping systems in Punjab , 2012 .

[14]  K. Harker,et al.  Forage Potential of Intercropping Barley with Faba Bean, Lupin, or Field Pea , 2008 .

[15]  S. Adhikari,et al.  Bio-economic evaluation of maize (Zea mays) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping in drought-prone areas of Chotonagpur plateau region of Jharkhand , 2005 .