Bioelectromagnetism in Human Brain Research: New Applications, New Questions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Haueisen,et al. Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex , 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[2] M. Junghöfer,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates perceptual and neural patterns of fear generalization. , 2021, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.
[3] S. Noachtar,et al. Acute effects of spaced cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in drug resistant focal epilepsies , 2021, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[4] Richard M. Leahy,et al. Realistic head modeling of electromagnetic brain activity: an integrated Brainstorm-DUNEuro pipeline from MRI data to the FEM solutions , 2021 .
[5] Yoshio Okada,et al. Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[6] Carsten H. Wolters,et al. DUNEuro—A software toolbox for forward modeling in bioelectromagnetism , 2019, PloS one.
[7] C. Wolters,et al. Parametrizing the Conditionally Gaussian Prior Model for Source Localization with Reference to the P20/N20 Component of Median Nerve SEP/SEF , 2020, Brain sciences.
[8] M. Clerc,et al. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources , 2020, Human brain mapping.
[9] Michalis E. Zervakis,et al. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models , 2020, NeuroImage.
[10] Matthew J. Brookes,et al. Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system , 2020, NeuroImage.
[11] Chunyan Liu,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm parallel multicenter study , 2020, Brain Stimulation.
[12] Andreas K. Engel,et al. Individual Targeting Increases Control Over Inter-Individual Variability in Simulated Transcranial Electric Fields , 2020, IEEE Access.
[13] M. Nitsche,et al. Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[14] J. Gross. Magnetoencephalography in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer , 2019, Neuron.
[15] Carsten H. Wolters,et al. Individualized Targeting and Optimization of Multi-channel Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy , 2019, 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE).
[16] Lauri Parkkonen,et al. Potential of on‐scalp MEG: Robust detection of human visual gamma‐band responses , 2019, Human brain mapping.
[17] Michael Buchfelder,et al. Magnetoencephalography for epileptic focus localization in a series of 1000 cases. , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[18] Carsten H. Wolters,et al. Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction , 2019, Front. Neurosci..
[19] Robert Chen,et al. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG , 2019, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[20] Lauri Parkkonen,et al. Potential of on-scalp MEG: Robust detection of human visual gamma-band responses , 2019, bioRxiv.
[21] Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al. A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations , 2019, NeuroImage.
[22] Carlos Muravchik,et al. Unification of optimal targeting methods in transcranial electrical stimulation , 2019, NeuroImage.
[23] M. Murray,et al. Electroencephalography , 2019, Current Biology.
[24] Aapo Nummenmaa,et al. Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.
[25] Ole Jensen,et al. Low-frequency alternating current stimulation rhythmically suppresses gamma-band oscillations and impairs perceptual performance , 2019, NeuroImage.
[26] Gilles Cauffet,et al. Magnetoencephalography With Optically Pumped 4He Magnetometers at Ambient Temperature , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[27] Alexander Opitz,et al. On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, NeuroImage.
[28] Matthew R. Krause,et al. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.
[29] J. Schoffelen,et al. Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing in Neuroimaging using MEEG , 2018 .
[30] A. Puce,et al. IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[31] Carsten H. Wolters,et al. Noninvasive stimulation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates emotional face processing , 2018, NeuroImage.
[32] Hartwig R. Siebner,et al. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art , 2018, NeuroImage.
[33] Niall Holmes,et al. Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system , 2018, Nature.
[34] C. Herrmann,et al. Optimized auditory transcranial alternating current stimulation improves individual auditory temporal resolution , 2018, Brain Stimulation.
[35] Markus Siegel,et al. Analyzing EEG and MEG signals recorded during tES, a reply , 2018, NeuroImage.
[36] C. Pantev,et al. Randomized trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for poststroke dysphagia , 2018, Annals of neurology.
[37] Peter Zwanzger,et al. Modulating Emotion Perception: Opposing Effects of Inhibitory and Excitatory Prefrontal Cortex Stimulation. , 2017, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.
[38] Lucas C. Parra,et al. Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated open-source pipeline , 2017, bioRxiv.
[39] J. Rothwell,et al. tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow , 2017, Brain Stimulation.
[40] M. Nitsche,et al. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.
[41] A. Bonci,et al. Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[42] S. Rossi,et al. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines , 2017, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[43] J. Gross,et al. Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects , 2017, Current Biology.
[44] Gregor Thut,et al. Oscillatory Activities in Neurological Disorders of Elderly: Biomarkers to Target for Neuromodulation , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..
[45] Dean Sabatinelli,et al. Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Pleasant Scene Processing , 2017, Cerebral cortex.
[46] Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al. Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields , 2017, Cell.
[47] T. Knösche,et al. Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study , 2017, Brain Topography.
[48] C. Miniussi,et al. Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper , 2017, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[49] Riitta Hari,et al. MEG–EEG Primer , 2017 .
[50] Sylvain Baillet,et al. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.
[51] Toralf Neuling,et al. Faith and oscillations recovered: On analyzing EEG/MEG signals during tACS , 2017, NeuroImage.
[52] L. Parra,et al. Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.
[53] Christoph Braun,et al. Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.
[54] Ole Jensen,et al. On the relationship between cortical excitability and visual oscillatory responses — A concurrent tDCS–MEG study , 2016, NeuroImage.
[55] Hartwig R. Siebner,et al. Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives , 2016, NeuroImage.
[56] C. Herrmann,et al. Eyes wide shut: Transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[57] A. Aarabi,et al. EEG Resting State Functional Connectivity Analysis in Children with Benign Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes , 2016, Front. Neurosci..
[58] Martin Burger,et al. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem , 2016, NeuroImage.
[59] J. Voges,et al. Lesion guided stereotactic radiofrequency thermocoagulation for palliative, in selected cases curative epilepsy surgery , 2016, Epilepsy Research.
[60] Scott Makeig,et al. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation , 2016, NeuroImage.
[61] Martin Burger,et al. An Optimization Approach for Well-Targeted Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Math..
[62] Ursula van Rienen,et al. Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.
[63] M. Piradov,et al. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[64] D. Senkowski,et al. Dysfunctional Prefrontal Gamma-Band Oscillations Reflect Working Memory and Other Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.
[65] Thomas R. Knösche,et al. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG , 2014, NeuroImage.
[66] D. Stegeman,et al. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.
[67] G. A. Miller,et al. Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. , 2014, Psychophysiology.
[68] Peter T. Fox,et al. PET-Based Confirmation of Orientation Sensitivity of TMS-Induced Cortical Activation in Humans , 2013, Brain Stimulation.
[69] C. Herrmann,et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[70] Joachim Gross,et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research , 2013, NeuroImage.
[71] Lucas C. Parra,et al. Subject position affects EEG magnitudes , 2013, NeuroImage.
[72] M. Clerc,et al. Comparison of Boundary Element and Finite Element Approaches to the EEG Forward Problem , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.
[73] M. Koenigs,et al. Functional anatomy of ventromedial prefrontal cortex: implications for mood and anxiety disorders , 2012, Molecular Psychiatry.
[74] Romain Brette,et al. Handbook of neural activity measurement , 2012 .
[75] L. Parra,et al. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.
[76] Théodore Papadopoulo,et al. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.
[77] Théodore Papadopoulo,et al. The adjoint method for general EEG and MEG sensor-based lead field equations , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.
[78] Bart Vanrumste,et al. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in Eeg Source Analysis , 2022 .
[79] G. Tononi,et al. Reduced evoked gamma oscillations in the frontal cortex in schizophrenia patients: a TMS/EEG study. , 2008, American Journal of Psychiatry.
[80] George Dassios,et al. On the complementarity of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography , 2007 .
[81] Harald Köstler,et al. Numerical Mathematics of the Subtraction Method for the Modeling of a Current Dipole in EEG Source Reconstruction Using Finite Element Head Models , 2007, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..
[82] Y. Okada,et al. Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals , 2006, The Journal of physiology.
[83] Xavier Tricoche,et al. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: A simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling , 2006, NeuroImage.
[84] R. Ilmoniemi,et al. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.
[85] Olivier D. Faugeras,et al. A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[86] M. Murray,et al. EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[87] Gareth R. Barnes,et al. Dissociating the spatio-temporal characteristics of cortical neuronal activity associated with human volitional swallowing in the healthy adult brain , 2004, NeuroImage.
[88] C. H. Wolters,et al. Comparing Regularized and Non-Regularized Nonlinear Dipole Fit Methods: A Study in a Simulated Sulcus Structure , 2004, Brain Topography.
[89] G. Nolte. The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.
[90] W. Hackbusch,et al. Efficient Computation of Lead Field Bases and Influence Matrix for the FEM-based EEG and MEG Inverse Problem. Part I: Complexity Considerations , 2003 .
[91] J. Haueisen,et al. The Influence of Brain Tissue Anisotropy on Human EEG and MEG , 2002, NeuroImage.
[92] Richard M. Leahy,et al. Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..
[93] A. Schnitzler,et al. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[94] R. Leahy,et al. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.
[95] W. Drongelen,et al. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[96] J. D. Munck,et al. A fast method to compute the potential in the multisphere model (EEG application) , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[97] J.C. Mosher,et al. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[98] S. Boniface,et al. Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[99] M. Scherg,et al. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[100] D. A. Driscoll,et al. EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.
[101] H. Helmholtz. Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch‐elektrischen Versuche , 1853 .