Reactive and Proactive Control in Arithmetical Strategy Selection

Individual differences in arithmetic have been explained by differences in cognitive processes and by arithmetic strategy use and selection. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of reactive and proactive control processes. We explored how variation in proactive and reactive control was related to individual differences in strategy selection. We correlated proactive and reactive measures obtained from the AX-CPT and an adjusted N-back task with a measure of strategy adaptiveness during a numerosity judgment task. The results showed that both measures of reactive control (of the AX-CPT and N-back task) correlated positively with strategy adaptiveness, while proactive control was not. This suggests that both cognitive control modes might have a different effect on adaptive strategy selection, where adaptive strategy selection seems to benefit from a transient (late) control mode, reactive control. We discuss these results in the light of the Dual Mechanisms Framework.

[1]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Age-related changes in strategic variations during arithmetic problem solving: The role of executive control. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[2]  Ajay B. Satpute,et al.  Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[3]  Todd S. Braver,et al.  A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[4]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The development of strategy use in elementary school children: working memory and individual differences. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  T. Braver,et al.  Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. , 2007 .

[6]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Patrick Lemaire,et al.  The Sources of Sequential Modulations of Control Processes in Arithmetic Strategies: A Magnetoencephalography Study , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Developmental cognitive neuroscience of arithmetic: implications for learning and education , 2010, ZDM : the international journal on mathematics education.

[9]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Context-dependent switching between proactive and reactive working memory control mechanisms in the right inferior frontal gyrus , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  T. Braver,et al.  Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  T. Braver The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  R. Siegler,et al.  Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[17]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The influence of problem features and individual differences on strategic performance in simple arithmetic , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[20]  M. Barnes,et al.  Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. , 2010 .

[21]  Children's strategy use in computational estimation. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[23]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Analysing the adaptiveness of strategy choices using the choice/no-choice method: The case of numerosity judgement , 2003 .

[24]  Michael J. Larson,et al.  Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[25]  N. Phillips,et al.  Aging and sequential modulations of poorer strategy effects: An EEG study in arithmetic problem solving , 2016, Brain Research.

[26]  Peter E Clayson,et al.  Sex differences in error-related performance monitoring , 2011, Neuroreport.

[27]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  L. Reder,et al.  What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Developmental science.

[30]  Marinus H. van IJzendoorn,et al.  Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: A meta-analytical study , 2013 .

[31]  M. Botvinick Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[33]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  John G. Kerns,et al.  Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Siegler,et al.  Four aspects of strategic change: contributions to children's learning of multiplication. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  G. Scerif,et al.  Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children's Mathematics Ability: Inhibition, Switching, and Working Memory , 2001, Developmental neuropsychology.

[39]  Anne-Marie R. Iselin,et al.  Reactive and proactive control in incarcerated and community adolescents and young adults. , 2009, Cognitive development.

[40]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[41]  B. Nazarian,et al.  Processes in arithmetic strategy selection: a fMRI study , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[42]  U. Andersson Working memory as a predictor of written arithmetical skills in children: the importance of central executive functions. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[43]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. , 2013, Developmental science.

[44]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Adults' age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: evidence from computational estimation. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[45]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Inhibition and shifting capacities mediate adults' age-related differences in strategy selection and repertoire. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The Mathematical Brain Across the Lifespan , 2016 .

[47]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[48]  E. Kroesbergen,et al.  Individual Differences in Early Numeracy , 2009 .