Runoff simulation using a modified SWAT model with spatially continuous HRUs

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is a well-established eco-hydrologic model that employs the hydrological response unit (HRU) as the basic unit. Land surface patches within one HRU have identical hydrological properties (e.g., land use, soil, slope and management) and thus have similar hydrological responses. The non-spatial aspects of HRUs, however, are considered a key weakness of the SWAT model because it is difficult to determine the spatial locations and describe the interactions between different HRUs. Here, a new method to produce continuous HRUs with a clear spatial position for SWAT using Geographic Information System tools is proposed and then tested in a small catchment of the Taihu Basin, China. The SWAT model was then modified based on spatial continuous discretized HRUs accounting for the surface runoff lag difference of HRUs in one sub-basin. The results showed that the modified model was more sensitive to the lag in runoff processes and thus had better simulation accuracy.

[1]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  SWAT Ungauged: Hydrological Budget and Crop Yield Predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin , 2010 .

[2]  Ray B. Bryant,et al.  Perspectives on the potential for hydropedology to improve watershed modeling of phosphorus loss , 2006 .

[3]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[4]  G. Migiros,et al.  Pinios (Peneus) River (Central Greece): Hydrological — Geomorphological elements and changes during the quaternary , 2011 .

[5]  Richard G. Taylor,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in climate change impacts on river discharge and groundwater in a headwater catchment of the Upper Nile Basin, Uganda , 2010 .

[6]  F. Hao,et al.  Soil erosion and sediment yield and their relationships with vegetation cover in upper stream of the Yellow River. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Modelling the point and non-point nitrogen loads to the Venice Lagoon (Italy): the application of water quality models to the Dese-Zero basin , 2008 .

[8]  Stephen Wise,et al.  Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours , 2000 .

[9]  Joo-Cheol Kim,et al.  Turbidity control in downstream of the reservoir: the Nakdong River in Korea , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[10]  Hugh G. Smith,et al.  Sediment budget analysis of slope–channel coupling and in-channel sediment storage in an upland catchment, southeastern Australia , 2008 .

[11]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[13]  Xixi Wang,et al.  Simulated environmental effects of wetland restoration scenarios in a typical Canadian prairie watershed , 2010, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[14]  D. Alexakis,et al.  Environmental research of groundwater in the urban and suburban areas of Attica region, Greece , 2008 .

[15]  G. Vižintin,et al.  Groundwater nitrate vulnerability assessment in alluvial aquifer using process-based models and weights-of-evidence method: Lower Savinja Valley case study (Slovenia) , 2011 .

[16]  Kenneth J. Tobin,et al.  Using SWAT to Model Streamflow in Two River Basins With Ground and Satellite Precipitation Data 1 , 2009 .

[17]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in hydrological modelling in a data sparse region , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[18]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modeling blue and green water availability in Africa , 2008 .

[19]  E. Vassiliades,et al.  Environmental research and evaluation of agricultural soil of the Arta plain, western Hellas , 2014 .

[20]  Mohsin Hafeez,et al.  Streamflow modeling in a fluctuant climate using SWAT: Yass River catchment in south eastern Australia , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[21]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A GIS‐Coupled Hydrological Model System for the Watershed Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint and Point Sources of Pollution , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[22]  J. Refsgaard.  Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[24]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[25]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin , 2000 .

[26]  E. Vassiliades,et al.  Distribution of trace elements in stream sediments of Arta plain (western Hellas): The influence of geomorphological parameters , 2013 .

[27]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model: Current Developments and Applications , 2010 .

[28]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .