Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC

Empirical studies and theory suggest that educational dialogue can be used to support learners in the development of reasoning, critical thinking and argumentation. This paper presents an educational design for synchronous online peer discussion that guides student dialogue in ways that lead to improved argumentation and collaborative knowledge development. This design includes a mediating interface – or tool, linked to a broader set of online educational activities – a designed local context, where the latter aims to provide conditions that support argumentation. The approach is based on collaborative working and dialogue game approaches to discussion. Preliminary findings with UK Open University students showed the argumentation process was more coherent, varied, deeper and extended when using our interaction design compared with the use of a simple unstructured interface.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. , 1994 .

[3]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Monitoring computer-based collaborative problem solving , 1995 .

[4]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Creative and Critical Thinking Through Academic Controversy , 1993 .

[5]  David Newman.  How can WWW-based groupware better support critical thinking in CSCL? , 1996 .

[6]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Interactional Organization of Computer Mediated Communication in the College Classroom , 1998 .

[7]  A. L. Veerman,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation , 2000 .

[8]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  From conditioning to learning communities: Implications of fifty years of research in e-learning interaction design , 2003 .

[9]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  Interacting with computer-based simulation: The role of dialogue , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Designing computer-mediated epistemic interactions • , 1999 .

[11]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[12]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Favouring modellable computer-mediated argumentative dialogue in collaborative problem-solving situations , 1999 .

[13]  Terry Anderson.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online by Gilly Salmon , 2000 .

[14]  Amy Soller,et al.  Analyzing Peer Dialogue from an Active Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[15]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3 , 1994 .

[16]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Designing argumentation for conceptual development , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Susan C. Herring.  Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[19]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Conferencing in communities of learners: examples from social history and science communication , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Rachel M. Pilkington,et al.  Investigation by Design: Developing Dialogue Models to Support Reasoning and Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[23]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[24]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 1999 .

[25]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone , 1999 .

[26]  Paul Bacsich,et al.  Embedding computer conferencing into university teaching , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Rachel Pilkington,et al.  Using CMC to Develop Argumentation Skills in Childre with a ‘Literacy Deficit’ , 2003 .

[29]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation , 1999, CSCL.