The paper discusses the incorporation of richer semantic structures into the preference semantics system. They are called pseudotexts and capture something of the information expressed in one type of frame proposed by Minsky. However, they are in a format, and subject to rules of inference, consistent with earlier accounts of this system of language analysis and understanding. Their use is discussed in connection with the phenomenon of extended use: sentences where the semantic preferences are broken. It is argued that such situations are the norm and not the exception in normal language use, and that a language understanding system must give some general treatment of them. A notion of sense projection is proposed, leading on to an alteration of semantic formulas (word sense representations) in the face of unexpected context by drawing information from the pseudotexts. A possible implementation is described, based on a new semantic parser for the preference semantics system, which would cope with extended use by the methods suggested and answer questions about the process of analysis itself. It is argued that this would be a good context in which to place a language understander (rather than that of question-answering about a limited area of the real world, as is usual) and, moreover, that the sense projection mechanisms suggested would provide a test bed on which the usefulness of frames for language understanding could be realistically assessed.
[1]
Yorick Wilks.
Primitives and words
,
1975,
TINLAP '75.
[2]
J. Fodor,et al.
The structure of a semantic theory
,
1963
.
[3]
Yorick Wilks,et al.
A Preferential, Pattern-Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference
,
1975,
Artif. Intell..
[4]
Yorick Wilks,et al.
An intelligent analyzer and understander of English
,
1975,
Commun. ACM.
[5]
Eugene Charniak.
Framed PAINTING: The Representation of a Common Sense Knowledge Fragment
,
1977
.
[6]
Roger C. Schank,et al.
Using Knowledge to Understand
,
1975,
TINLAP.
[7]
Yorick Wilks.
What Sort of Taxonomy of Causation Do We Need for Language Understanding?
,
1977,
Cogn. Sci..
[8]
Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.
On Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language
,
1976,
Cogn. Sci..
[9]
H. Grice.
Logic and conversation
,
1975
.
[10]
Raj Reddy,et al.
The HEARSAY Speech Understanding System
,
1974
.
[11]
Robert Wilensky,et al.
Why John Married Mary: Understanding Stories Involving Recurring Goals
,
1978,
Cogn. Sci..
[12]
Charles J. Fillmore,et al.
SCENES- AND- FRAMES SEMANTICS.
,
1977
.