Occurrence and fate of relevant substances in wastewater treatment plants regarding Water Framework Directive and future legislations.

The next challenge of wastewater treatment is to reliably remove micropollutants at the microgram per litre range. During the present work more than 100 substances were analysed through on-site mass balances over 19 municipal wastewater treatment lines. The most relevant substances according to their occurrence in raw wastewater, in treated wastewater and in sludge were identified, and their fate in wastewater treatment processes was assessed. About half of priority substances of WFD were found at concentrations higher than 0.1 μg/L in wastewater. For 26 substances, potential non-compliance with Environmental Quality Standard of Water Framework Directive has been identified in treated wastewater, depending on river flow. Main concerns are for Cd, DEHP, diuron, alkylphenols, and chloroform. Emerging substances of particular concern are by-products, organic chemicals (e.g. triclosan, benzothiazole) and pharmaceuticals (e.g. ketoprofen, diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, carbamazepine). About 80% of the load of micropollutants was removed by conventional activated sludge plants, but about two-thirds of removed substances were mainly transferred to sludge.

[1]  J. Choubert,et al.  On-site evaluation of the efficiency of conventional and advanced secondary processes for the removal of 60 organic micropollutants. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  J. Choubert,et al.  Occurrence and removal of estrogens and beta blockers by various processes in wastewater treatment plants. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  M. Coquery,et al.  Prélèvement et échantillonnage des substances prioritaires et émergentes dans les eaux usées - Les prescriptions techniques du projet de recherche Amperes , 2009 .

[4]  J. Müller,et al.  Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[5]  Anne Togola,et al.  Consequences of treated water recycling as regards pharmaceuticals and drugs in surface and ground waters of a medium-sized Mediterranean catchment. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Shane A. Snyder,et al.  Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals , 2007 .

[7]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. , 2005, Water research.

[8]  K. Londry,et al.  Anaerobic biotransformation of estrogens. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  A Joss,et al.  Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants? , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Frank Sacher,et al.  Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  M. Esperanza,et al.  Reduction of endocrine disruptor emissions in the environment: the benefit of wastewater treatment. , 2009, Water research.

[12]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents: a pilot study. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  G. Lavison,et al.  Transfer of glyphosate and its degradate AMPA to surface waters through urban sewerage systems. , 2009, Chemosphere.

[14]  K. Linden,et al.  Evaluation of UV irradiation for photolytic and oxidative degradation of pharmaceutical compounds in water. , 2007, Water research.

[15]  V Lazarova,et al.  On-site evaluation of the removal of 100 micro-pollutants through advanced wastewater treatment processes for reuse applications. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.