Large class teaching: How does one go about the task of moderating large volumes of assessment?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] John Partington. Double‐marking Students' Work , 1994 .
[2] Lenore Adie,et al. Identifying discourses of moderation in higher education , 2013 .
[3] D. Boud,et al. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design , 2013 .
[4] A. Mutch. Exploring the Practice of Feedback to Students , 2003 .
[5] Sarah K. Nielsen. Instructional Insights: Audio Feedback as Means of Engaging the Occupational Therapy Student , 2016, Occupational therapy in health care.
[6] V. Shute. Focus on Formative Feedback , 2007 .
[7] Eric C. Nemec,et al. Comparison of Audio Versus Written Feedback on Writing Assignments , 2016 .
[8] Sandra Wills,et al. The RED Resource, Recognition - Enhancement - Development: The contribution of sessional teachers to higher education (Complete report) , 2008 .
[9] Andrea Gorra,et al. Assessment feedback only on demand: Supporting the few not supplying the many , 2013 .
[10] Debbie Clewes,et al. Marking the Difference: An investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school , 2000 .
[11] Susan Bloxham,et al. Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources , 2009 .
[12] Win Hornby,et al. Assessing Using Grade-related Criteria: A single currency for universities? , 2003 .
[13] Peter Bolan,et al. ‘I like the sound of that’ – an evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment , 2015 .
[14] Lenore Adie,et al. What’s the point of moderation? A discussion of the purposes achieved through contemporary moderation practices , 2016 .
[15] G. Nash,et al. Can a systematic assessment moderation process assure the quality and integrity of assessment practice while supporting the professional development of casual academics? , 2016 .
[16] M. Price,et al. Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria , 2016 .
[17] Kathy Everts Danielson,et al. Formative Feedback: Involving Students as Partners in Assessment to Enhance Learning , 2010 .
[18] Tom Lunt,et al. ‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback , 2010 .
[19] Mantz Yorke,et al. Mark Distributions and Marking Practices in UK Higher Education , 2000 .
[20] Sonja Kuzich,et al. Building team capacity: sustaining quality in assessment and moderation practices in a fully online unit , 2010 .
[21] D. Hounsell,et al. The quality of guidance and feedback to students , 2008 .
[22] Anders Jonsson,et al. Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education , 2013 .
[23] Claire Maree Wyatt-Smith,et al. Standards, Teacher Judgement and Moderation in Contexts of National Curriculum and Assessment Reform , 2010 .
[24] Mantz Yorke. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .
[25] Elaine Mowat,et al. Audio feedback: richer language but no measurable impact on student performance. , 2014 .
[26] P. Grainger,et al. Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers , 2008 .
[27] Chris Rust,et al. A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice , 2005 .
[28] M. Taras,et al. Perceptions and realities in the functions and processes of assessment , 2013 .
[29] D. Nicol,et al. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .
[30] T. Jessop,et al. Mind the gap: An analysis of how quality assurance processes influence programme assessment patterns , 2012 .
[31] Jon Yorke,et al. Towards sustainable marking practices and improved quality of feedback in short-answer assessments , 2010 .