Laughter conveys status.

Abstract We propose that status influences individuals' use of dominant versus submissive laughter, and that individuals are conferred status based on the way they laugh. In Study 1, naturally occurring laughter was observed while low- and high-status individuals teased one another. The use of dominant and submissive laughter corresponded to hierarchical variables: High-status individuals and teasers displayed more dominant, disinhibited laughs, whereas low-status individuals and targets of teases displayed more submissive, inhibited laughs. Further, low-status individuals were more likely to vary the form of their laughter between contexts than high-status individuals. Study 2 demonstrated that laughter influences perceptions of status by naive observers. Individuals who laughed dominantly were afforded higher status than individuals who laughed submissively, regardless of their actual status. Moreover, low-status laughers were perceived to be significantly higher in status, and to have as much status as high-status laughers, when laughing dominantly versus submissively. Finally, exploratory analyses suggest that the positive emotional reactions of observers of laughter can help explain the link between laugh type and status perceptions.

[1]  Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno,et al.  The Pursuit of Status: A Self-presentational Perspective on the Quest for Social Value , 2014 .

[2]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch , 2006 .

[3]  William J. Mayew,et al.  Voice Pitch and the Labor Market Success of Male Chief Executive Officers , 2013 .

[4]  V. Hooff.  A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. , 1972 .

[5]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2015 .

[6]  Pamela K Smith,et al.  The interpersonal nature of power and status , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[7]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach , 2008, Psychological science.

[8]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  The science of social vision , 2010 .

[9]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[11]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[12]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  The acoustic features of human laughter. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  The Social Distance Theory of Power , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  S. Gosling,et al.  Punishing Hubris: The Perils of Overestimating One's Status in a Group , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Sei Jin Ko,et al.  The Sound of Power , 2015, Psychological science.

[18]  R. Provine.  Laughter Punctuates Speech: Linguistic, Social and Gender Contexts of Laughter , 2010 .

[19]  A. Caspi,et al.  Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  K. Grammer.  Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters , 1990 .

[21]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Signs of Socioeconomic Status A Thin-Slicing Approach , 2022 .

[22]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Reconsidering the Evolution of Nonlinguistic Communication: The Case of Laughter , 2003 .

[23]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Not All Laughs are Alike: Voiced but Not Unvoiced Laughter Readily Elicits Positive Affect , 2001, Psychological science.

[24]  Marc Mehu,et al.  Relationship between Smiling and Laughter in Humans (Homo sapiens): Testing the Power Asymmetry Hypothesis , 2008, Folia Primatologica.

[25]  Dacher Keltner,et al.  Born to Be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life , 2009 .

[26]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  Teasing, Taunting, and the Politics of Politeness: High Sociometric Status Is Associated with Expectation-Consistent Behavior , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  Matthew M. Gervais,et al.  THE EVOLUTION AND FUNCTIONS OF LAUGHTER AND HUMOR: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[28]  R. Provine,et al.  Laughing, Smiling, and Talking: Relation to Sleeping and Social Context in Humans , 2010 .

[29]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Lowering the Pitch of Your Voice Makes You Feel More Powerful and Think More Abstractly , 2012 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy of Behavioral Predictions at Zero Acquaintance: A Social Relations Analysis , 1993 .

[31]  Max Weisbuch,et al.  Thin-Slice Vision , 2010 .

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power and affordances: when the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[35]  D. Keltner,et al.  Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Frequency of Public Laughter in Relation to Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Social Context , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. , 1966 .