The ‘Black Sheep Effect’: Social Categorization, Rejection of Ingroup Deviates, and Perception of Group Variability

In this chapter we review evidence on the ‘black sheep effect’: subjects judge likable ingroup members more positively than similar outgroup members, while judging unlikable ingroup members more negatively than similar outgroup members. We attempt to relate these findings to traditional research on group uniformity (Cartwright & Zander, 1968; Festinger, 1950), and to more recent research on social identity (Hogg & Abrams, 1988), and outgroup homogeneity (Park, Judd, & Ryan, 1991). The general idea is that the black sheep effect operates to preserve a positive social identity. It is an outcome of subjective representations of a normative pressure towards ingroup uniformity.

[1]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Measures and models of perceived group variability. , 1990 .

[2]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[3]  M. Hogg,et al.  Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  L. A. Sullivan,et al.  The Effects of Positive Information on Evaluations of Black and White Targets by Black and White Subjects , 1987 .

[5]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[6]  John C. Turner,et al.  The social dimension: Social identification and psychological group formation , 1984 .

[7]  R. Hymes,et al.  Gender and Social Categorization: Familiarity and Ingroup Polarization in Recall and Evaluation , 1985 .

[8]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Theoretical contributions: A five‐stage model of intergroup relations , 1984 .

[9]  Rupert Brown.  The social dimension: The role of similarity in intergroup relations , 1984 .

[10]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[11]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[12]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar and Prototype Use in Social Categorization , 1990 .

[13]  R. Hastie,et al.  Perception of variability in category development: Instance- versus abstraction-based stereotypes. , 1987 .

[14]  M. Billig.  Social psychology and intergroup relations , 1976 .

[15]  C. Kelly.  Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity , 1989 .

[16]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[17]  P. Linville,et al.  The complexity–extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. , 1982 .

[18]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Knowledge structures and evaluative judgments: Effects of structural variables on judgmental extremity. , 1984 .

[19]  S. Schachter.  Deviation, rejection, and communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  M. Hogg,et al.  An introduction to the social identity approach , 1990 .

[21]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[22]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process , 1948 .

[23]  L. Jussim,et al.  The nature of stereotypes: a comparison and integration of three theories , 1987 .

[24]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[25]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[26]  S. Schachter,et al.  An Experimental Study of Cohesiveness and Productivity , 1951 .

[27]  Cognitive aspects of prejudice. , 1969 .

[28]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[29]  N. Kerr,et al.  The Psychology of the courtroom , 1981 .

[30]  John C. Turner,et al.  Referent informational influence and group polarization. , 1989 .

[31]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[32]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Social Categorization: Implications for Creation and Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[33]  J. Marques,et al.  Ingroup bias and the black sheep' effect: assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements , 1992 .

[34]  P. Ditto,et al.  From rarity to evaluative extremity: effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[36]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization, interpersonal attraction and group formation , 1983 .

[37]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. , 1988 .

[38]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[39]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[40]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[41]  S. Kiesler.  Interpersonal processes in groups and organizations , 1978 .

[42]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[43]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[44]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations , 1988 .

[45]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Reactions to Opinion Deviates as Affected by Affiliation Need (n) and Group Member Interdependence , 1959 .

[46]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  L. Festinger,et al.  Interpersonal communication in small groups. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[48]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[49]  L. Festinger,et al.  Social pressures in informal groups , 1950 .

[50]  B. Simon.  Intragroup differentiation in terms of ingroup and outgroup attributes , 1992 .

[51]  I. Janis.  GROUP IDENTIFICATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF EXTERNAL DANGER. , 1963, The British journal of medical psychology.

[52]  J. Levine,et al.  Socialization in Small Groups: Temporal Changes in Individual-Group Relations1 , 1982 .

[53]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. , 1980 .

[54]  Gérard Lemaine.  Social differentiation and social originality , 1974 .

[55]  P. Salovey,et al.  Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: empirical evidence and a computer simulation. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  José da Conceição Mendes Marques,et al.  The black sheep effect: outgroup homogeneity in social comparison settings , 1990 .

[57]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Changes in Social Perception as a Function of the Personal Relevance of Behavior , 1957 .

[58]  The Effects of Role and Opinion Deviation on Small Group Behavior , 1964 .

[59]  Martin Steinmann,et al.  Thought and Language , 1973 .

[60]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Polarized appraisals of out-group members. , 1980 .

[61]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior , 1985 .

[62]  Nyla R. Branscombe,et al.  In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity , 1993 .

[63]  A. Mummendey,et al.  ‘Different‘ just means ‘better’: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in‐group favouritism , 1984 .

[64]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members , 1982 .

[65]  W. Doise.  Individual and social identities in intergroup relations , 1988 .