Anthropogenic noise affects risk assessment and attention: the distracted prey hypothesis

Many studies have focused on the effects of anthropogenic noise on animal communication, but only a few have looked at its effect on other behavioural systems. We designed a playback experiment to test the effect of noise on predation risk assessment. We found that in response to boat motor playback, Caribbean hermit crabs (Coenobita clypeatus) allowed a simulated predator to approach closer before they hid. Two hypotheses may explain how boat noise affected risk assessment: it masked an approaching predator's sound; and/or it reallocated some of the crabs' finite attention, effectively distracting them, and thus preventing them from responding to an approaching threat. We found no support for the first hypothesis: a silent looming object still got closer during boat motor playbacks than during silence. However, we found support for the attentional hypothesis: when we added flashing lights to the boat motor noise to further distract the hermit crabs, we were able to approach the crabs more closely than with the noise alone. Anthropogenic sounds may thus distract prey and make them more vulnerable to predation.

[1]  T. Caro,et al.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals , 2006 .

[2]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) , 2006 .

[3]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[4]  Jens Krause,et al.  Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey , 1996 .

[5]  E. F. Edwards,et al.  Anthropogenic Noise as a Stressor in Animals: A Multidisciplinary Perspective , 2007 .

[6]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting , 2006 .

[7]  John J. Walsh,et al.  Urban effects on native avifauna: a review , 2006 .

[8]  William G. Frederick,et al.  Optimal flight initiation distance. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  P. Tyack,et al.  Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise , 2007 .

[10]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[11]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[12]  L. Hatch,et al.  A Brief Review of Anthropogenic Sound in the Oceans , 2007, International Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[13]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[14]  R. Dukas,et al.  Causes and Consequences of Limited Attention , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[15]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla , 2006 .

[16]  W. Burggren,et al.  Biology of the Land Crabs , 2009 .

[17]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[18]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Philip J. Bushnell,et al.  Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals , 1998, Psychopharmacology.

[21]  T. Root,et al.  Sound the stressor: how Hoatzins (Opisthocomus hoazin) react to ecotourist conversation , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.