Limits of ecodesign: the case for open source product development

Abstract In pursuit of coping mechanisms for the challenges of sustainable manufacturing, systematic methods have been developed to allow engineers to improve the ratio between products’ utility and environmental impact. These necessary efforts remain however limited if the surrounding production and consumption practices are not called into question at the same time. This article introduces open source product development as a potential approach for unlocking the limits of existing sustainable product design practices and to lead towards alternative and eco-efficient production and consumption practices termed as participative production. First, it discusses the potential advantages of this emerging practice in terms of environmental sustainability. Second, it provides a screened qualitative environmental analysis of 18 exemplary open source hardware products. Specific sustainable design principles implemented by these products are highlighted and discussed in order to identify challenges for further common research in the field of open source and sustainable product development.

[1]  Jean-François Boujut,et al.  Open design platforms for open source product development: current state and requirements , 2015 .

[2]  Jérémy Bonvoisin,et al.  Design Principles for Do-It-Yourself Production , 2017 .

[3]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  3-D Printing of Open Source Appropriate Technologies for Self-Directed Sustainable Development , 2010, Journal of Sustainable Development.

[4]  M. Mirata,et al.  Distributed economies - A new engine for innovation , 2005 .

[5]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  How Open is Open Source? – Software and Beyond , 2010 .

[6]  C. Herstatt,et al.  The Effect of Selective Openness on Value Creation in User Innovation Communities , 2014 .

[7]  Fiona Charnley,et al.  Can Re-distributed Manufacturing and Digital Intelligence Enable a Regenerative Economy? An Integrative Literature Review , 2016 .

[8]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  On the Open Design of Tangible Goods , 2009 .

[9]  Rainer Stark,et al.  Theorie und Praxis in der Open-Source-Produktentwicklung , 2016 .

[10]  Ashley Hall,et al.  Makespaces: From Redistributed Manufacturing to a Circular Economy , 2016 .

[11]  Paolo Rosso,et al.  Wikipedia Vandalism Detection: Combining Natural Language, Metadata, and Reputation Features , 2011, CICLing.

[12]  Cindy Kohtala,et al.  Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review , 2015 .

[13]  Guido Reger,et al.  Networking beyond the software code? an explorative examination of the development of an open source car project , 2010 .

[14]  Massimo Menichinelli,et al.  An Empirically Informed Taxonomy for the Maker Movement , 2016, INSCI.

[15]  S. Evans,et al.  A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes , 2014 .

[16]  Helmut Schmidt,et al.  Open up or Close down-The new Era of “ Openneers ” and how they lead the Way to Future Success , 2016 .

[17]  Suphunnika Ibbotson,et al.  Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications , 2015 .

[18]  G. Seliger,et al.  Open Manufacturing for Value Creation Cycles , 2012 .

[19]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed Three-Dimensional Printing and Conventional Manufacturing of Polymer Products , 2013 .

[20]  Rainer Stark,et al.  Sustainable Manufacturing: Challenges, Solutions and Implementation Perspectives , 2017 .

[21]  Jessica Lagerstedt,et al.  Guidelines in ecodesign: a case study from railway industry , 2006 .

[22]  Peggy Zwolinski,et al.  Influence of the Use/User Profile in the LCA of 3d Printed Products☆ , 2016 .

[23]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop--from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication , 2005 .

[24]  Jeremy Faludi,et al.  Comparing Environmental Impacts of Additive Manufacturing vs. Traditional Machining via Life-Cycle Assessment , 2015 .

[25]  A. Tukker,et al.  Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research , 2006 .

[26]  Y. Benkler,et al.  Commons‐based Peer Production and Virtue* , 2006 .

[27]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[28]  Tim C. McAloone,et al.  From Ecodesign to Sustainable Product/Service-Systems: A Journey Through Research Contributions over Recent Decades , 2017 .

[29]  George Dafermos,et al.  Design global, manufacture local: Exploring the contours of an emerging productive model , 2015 .

[30]  Rainer Stark,et al.  A systematic literature review on modular product design , 2016 .

[31]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The Current State of Open Source Hardware: The Need for an Open Source Development Platform , 2013 .

[32]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Open Source Development of Tangible Products - from a business perspective , 2012 .

[33]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability , 2016 .