Decreasing Risky Behavior on Social Network Sites: The Impact of Parental Involvement in Secondary Education Interventions

Abstract Teenagers face significant risks when using increasingly popular social network sites. Prevention and intervention efforts to raise awareness about these risks and to change risky behavior (so-called “e-safety” interventions) are essential for the wellbeing of these minors. However, several studies have revealed that while school interventions often affect awareness, they have only a limited impact on pupils’ unsafe behavior. Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior and theories about parental involvement, we hypothesized that involving parents in an e-safety intervention would positively influence pupils’ intentions and behavior. In a quasi-experimental study with pre- and post-test measures involving 207 pupils in secondary education, we compared the impact of an intervention without parental involvement with one that included active parental involvement by means of a homework task. We found that whereas parental involvement was not necessary to improve the intervention’s impact on risk awareness, it did change intentions to engage in certain unsafe behavior, such as posting personal and sexual information on the profile page of a social network site, and in reducing existing problematic behavior. This beneficial impact was particularly evident for boys. These findings suggest that developing prevention campaigns with active parental involvement is well worth the effort. Researchers and developers should therefore focus on other efficient strategies to involve parents.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[3]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[4]  James A. Brown Media Literacy Perspectives , 1998 .

[5]  Cindy A. Crusto,et al.  What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[6]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. , 2004, Journal of adolescence.

[7]  A. Bryman,et al.  Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods , 2004 .

[8]  J. Lochman Parent and Family Skills Training in Targeted Prevention Programs for At-Risk Youth , 2000, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[9]  Melinda C. Bier,et al.  Character Education: Parents as Partners. , 2005 .

[10]  R. Deslandes,et al.  Motivation of Parent Involvement in Secondary-Level Schooling , 2005 .

[11]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining Characteristics and Associated Distress Related to Internet Harassment: Findings From the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey , 2006, Pediatrics.

[12]  E. Maccoby,et al.  Historical overview of socialization research and theory. , 2007 .

[13]  Martyn Denscombe,et al.  Communities of Practice , 2008 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[15]  Meng-Jia Wu,et al.  Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Cyber Abuse of Youth: A Systematic Review , 2011 .

[16]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  Youth, Privacy and Reputation (Literature Review) , 2010 .

[17]  L. Haddon,et al.  Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: key findings from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries , 2010 .

[18]  Mary Madden,et al.  Reputation Management and Social Media: How People Monitor Their Identity and Search for Others Online , 2010 .

[19]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries , 2011 .

[21]  J. A. Simões,et al.  Agents of mediation and sources of safety awareness: a comparative overview , 2012 .

[22]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Empowering Students Against Bullying and Cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian Peer-led Model , 2012 .

[23]  L. d’Haenens,et al.  Coping and resilience: Children's responses to online risks , 2012 .

[24]  Beïnvloedende factoren van ouderbetrokkenheid: een empirische studie in traditionele en methodescholen , 2012 .

[25]  Rosario Del Rey Rosario Casas José A. Ortega El programa ConRed, una práctica basada en la evidencia = The ConRed Program, an Evidence-based Practice , 2012 .

[26]  José A. Casas,et al.  El programa ConRed, una práctica basada en la evidencia , 2012 .

[27]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  A global agenda for children’s rights in the digital age , 2013 .

[28]  danah boyd,et al.  Connected and concerned: Variation in parents' online safety concerns , 2013 .

[29]  Herbert Scheithauer,et al.  Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School , 2014, Prevention Science.

[30]  Ellen Vanderhoven,et al.  Educating Teens about the Risks on Social Network Sites. An intervention study in Secondary Education Enseñar a los adolescentes los riesgos de las redes sociales: Una propuesta de intervención en Secundaria , 2014 .

[31]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Involving Parents in School Programs about Safety on Social Network Sites , 2014 .

[32]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Educational packages about the risks on social network sites : state-of-the-art , 2014 .

[33]  Youth 2.0: Social Media and Adolescence , 2016 .