Beware of Allies!

In science and technology studies (STS), reflexivity is not the foremost political or ethical concern that it is for some postmodernists, feminists, anthropologists, or those earnest students of Bourdieu. For us, reflexivity is a practical methodological concern. When reflexivity is raised in our scholarly communications it is, without irony, about crafting scientific communications (i.e., scholarly accounts like articles or books) reflexively. This paper therefore is an actor-network account of making reflexive actor-network accounts, specifically, in the process of writing-up qualitative research findings. It is a paper about research. It is a paper about the research process. As our empirical contribution, we report on research we previously conducted and about the subsequent steps we took toward a (publishable) way of reporting it. We are trying to honestly disclose how the process of preparing a reflexive account is more than merely a matter of cleaning-up the messiness of data, but also, and perhaps foremost, a process of finding, aligning, and occasionally distancing our accounts from our allies — in our case, actor-network theory (ANT) and reflexivity.

[1]  E. Tiryakian,et al.  Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments. , 1970 .

[2]  Douglas Odegard,et al.  Knowledge and Reflexivity , 1976, Dialogue.

[3]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[4]  Rebecca D. Petersen Merton, Robert K. , 2014 .

[5]  L. Finlay Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice , 2002 .

[6]  John D. W. Guice,et al.  Controversy and the State: , 1998, Social studies of science.

[7]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Reflexivity in Organization and Management Theory: A Study of the Production of the Research `Subject' , 2001 .

[8]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[9]  T. Pinch,et al.  Health and efficiency : a sociology of health economics , 1989 .

[10]  D. Pels Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social theory of Knowledge , 2003 .

[11]  N. Rose Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self , 1991 .

[12]  M. Lynch Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge , 2000 .

[13]  Wendy Luttrell,et al.  Qualitative educational research : readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice , 2010 .

[14]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[15]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (2nd ed.). , 2007 .

[16]  G. Marcus Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography , 1995 .

[17]  R. Weiss Learning from strangers : the art and method of qualitative interview studies , 1995 .

[18]  Carl May,et al.  Remote Doctors and Absent Patients: Acting at a Distance in Telemedicine? , 2003 .

[19]  F. Steier Research and reflexivity , 1991 .

[20]  Mikael Klintman,et al.  The Genetically Modified (GM) Food Labelling Controversy , 2002 .

[21]  T. May Reflexivity in the age of reconstructive social science , 1998 .

[22]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia,et al.  Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice , 1996 .

[23]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Powers of Freedom: Contents , 1999 .

[24]  Nicholas J. Rowland,et al.  Actor-Network State , 2010 .

[25]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[26]  Evelleen Richards Vitamin C and Cancer: Medicine or Politics? , 1991, Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[27]  Miquel Domènech,et al.  Embodying Autonomy in a Home Telecare Service 1 , 2008 .

[28]  Carl May,et al.  Making and Unmaking Telepatients , 2009 .

[29]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[30]  Kathleen M. Boyle How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in Education & the Social and Behavioral Sciences (review) , 2005 .

[31]  Brian Rappert,et al.  The Distribution and Resolution of the Ambiguities of Technology, or Why Bobby Can't Spray , 2001 .

[32]  Joan Bolker,et al.  Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day: A Guide to Starting, Revising, and Finishing Your Doctoral Thesis , 1998 .

[33]  Nancy A. Naples A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The “outsider phenomenon” in rural Iowa , 1996 .

[34]  D. Bloor,et al.  Knowledge and Social Imagery , 1977 .

[35]  T. May Qualitative Research in Action , 2002 .

[36]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[37]  B. Gough,et al.  Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences , 2008 .

[38]  H. Garfinkel Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[39]  P. Lehoux The problem of health technology : policy implications for modern health care systems , 2006 .

[40]  Marc Berg,et al.  The Electronic Patient Record as a Meaningful Audit Tool:Accountability and Autonomy in General Practitioner Work , 2007 .

[41]  T. Brante,et al.  Brain or Heart? The Controversy over the Concept of Death , 1991 .

[42]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  On Formal Structures of Practical Actions , 2005 .

[43]  Patricia A. Adler,et al.  Parent-as-researcher: The politics of researching in the personal life , 1996 .

[44]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[45]  Andrew Webster,et al.  Innovative Health Technologies and the Social: Redefining Health, Medicine and the Body , 2002 .

[46]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[47]  R Horton,et al.  Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack‐up , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[48]  Christine Hine,et al.  Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS , 2007 .

[49]  G. Marcus Ethnography through Thick and Thin , 2021 .

[50]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis , 1985 .

[51]  Joshua Reno,et al.  Managing the Experience of Evidence , 2011 .

[52]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[53]  Don E. Lindley Becker, Howard S. , 2014, SAGE Research Methods Foundations.

[54]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. , 1991 .

[55]  T. May,et al.  Reflexivity and the Politics of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[56]  H. Harbers,et al.  Book Review: Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge; The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2005 .

[57]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[58]  M. A. Wichroski Breaking silence: Some fieldwork strategies in cloistered and non-cloistered communities , 1996 .

[59]  James Austin Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts: by Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1979. , 1982 .

[60]  Christopher Gad,et al.  On the Consequences of Post-ANT , 2010 .

[61]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[62]  Marek Czyżewski,et al.  Reflexivity of Actors Versus Reflexivity of Accounts , 1994 .

[63]  Richard M. Reis,et al.  Demystifying Dissertation Writing: A Streamlined Process from Choice of Topic to Final Text , 2009 .

[64]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[65]  M. Tatár The Annotated Classic Fairy Tales , 2002 .

[66]  D. Pels Reflexivity , 2000 .

[67]  N. Rose Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought , 1999 .

[68]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[69]  Robert Chia,et al.  The Problem of Reflexivity in Organizational Research: Towards a Postmodern Science of Organization , 1996 .