EMG activity normalization for trunk muscles in subjects with and without back pain.

PURPOSE The aims of the present study were to examine electromyographic (EMG) activity of six bilateral trunk muscles during maximal contraction in three cardinal planes and to determine the direction of contraction that gives maximal activation for each muscle, both for healthy subjects and back-pain patients. METHODS Twenty-eight healthy subjects and 15 back-pain patients performed maximum voluntary contractions in three cardinal planes. Surface EMG signals were recorded from rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, iliocostalis lumborum, and multifidus bilaterally. Root mean square values of the EMG data were calculated to quantify the amplitude of EMG signals. RESULTS For both healthy subjects and back-pain patients, one single direction of contraction was found to give the maximum EMG signals for most muscles. Rectus abdominis demonstrated maximal activity in trunk flexion, external oblique in lateral flexion, internal oblique in axial rotation, and multifidus in extension. For the latissimus dorsi and iliocostalis lumborum, maximal activity was demonstrated in more than one cardinal plane. CONCLUSION This study has implications for future research involving normalization of muscle activity to maximal levels required in many trunk EMG studies. As the latissimus dorsi and iliocostalis lumborum demonstrate individual differences in the plane that gives maximal activity, these muscles may require testing in more than one plane.

[1]  A. Schultz,et al.  The Activity of Individual Trunk Muscles During Heavy Physical Loading , 1987, Spine.

[2]  Mohamad Parnianpour,et al.  Fatigue-Related Changes in Torque Output and Electromyographic Parameters of Trunk Muscles During Isometric Axial Rotation Exertion: An Investigation in Patients With Back Pain and in Healthy Subjects , 2002, Spine.

[3]  A B Schultz,et al.  Co‐contraction of lumbar muscles during the development of time‐varying triaxial moments , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[5]  A. Schultz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Human Spine and Trunk , 1988, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[6]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  M Gagnon,et al.  Orientation and Moment Arms of Some Trunk Muscles , 1991, Spine.

[8]  Isometric maximal and submaximal trunk extension at different flexed positions in standing. Triaxial torque output and EMG. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  K. Türker,et al.  Electromyography: some methodological problems and issues. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[10]  A. Schultz,et al.  Lumbar trunk muscle use in standing isometric heavy exertions , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  S M McGill,et al.  The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[12]  G L Soderberg,et al.  A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[13]  G A Mirka,et al.  The quantification of EMG normalization error. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[14]  W. Marras,et al.  A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 1. Method development. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  C. Richardson,et al.  Electromyographic amplitude and frequency changes in the iliocostalis lumborum and multifidus muscles during a trunk holding test. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[16]  Mohamad Parnianpour,et al.  EMG activity of trunk muscles and torque output during isometric axial rotation exertion: a comparison between back pain patients and matched controls , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  G B Andersson,et al.  Trunk Muscle Activation: The Effects of Torso Flexion, Moment Direction, and Moment Magnitude , 1994, Spine.

[18]  G E Caldwell,et al.  Physiology and interpretation of the electromyogram. , 1996, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[19]  G. L. Soderberg,et al.  Electromyography in biomechanics. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[20]  S. McGill.  A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  M Gagnon,et al.  A Three‐Dimensional Digitization Method to Measure Trunk Muscle Lines of Action , 1988, Spine.

[22]  M Parnianpour,et al.  Functional roles of abdominal and back muscles during isometric axial rotation of the trunk , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  W. Marras,et al.  Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  S. McGill.  Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: Implications for lumbar mechanics , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.