Quantum Interference and Superposition in Cognition: Development of a Theory for the Disjunction of Concepts

We elaborate a theory for the modeling of concepts using the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Concepts are represented by vectors in the complex Hilbert space of quantum mechanics and membership weights of items are modeled by quantum weights calculated following the quantum rules. We apply this theory to model the disjunction of concepts and show that experimental data of membership weights of items with respect to the disjunction of concepts can be modeled accurately. It is the quantum effects of interference and superposition, combined with an effect of context, that are at the origin of the effects of overextension and underextension observed as deviations from a classical use of the disjunction. We put forward a graphical explanation of the effects of overextension and underextension by interpreting the quantum model applied to the modeling of the disjunction of concepts.

[1]  S. Grossberg The complementary brain: unifying brain dynamics and modularity , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Applications of Quantum Statistics in Psychological Studies of Decision Processes , 1995 .

[4]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology, Language, and Culture: A Non-Adaptationist Systems Theoretical Approach. , 2006 .

[5]  Robert F. Bordley,et al.  Experiment-dependent priors in psychology and physics , 1999 .

[6]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Combining Social Concepts: The Role of Causal Reasoning , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation , 2004 .

[8]  J. Hampton,et al.  Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  The Current Status of Research on Concept Combination , 1995 .

[10]  L. Komatsu Recent views of conceptual structure , 1992 .

[11]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Predicting conjunction typicalities by component typicalities , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Contextualizing Concepts , 2002, FLAIRS.

[13]  Emmanuel Haven Pilot-Wave Theory and Financial Option Pricing , 2005 .

[14]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties , 2005 .

[15]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[16]  W.,et al.  Categories and Concepts · Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  THE DOMINANCE EFFECT IN CONCEPT CONJUNCTIONS : GENERALITY AND INTERACTION ASPECTS , 1996 .

[18]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Learning Human-like Knowledge by Singular Value Decomposition: A Progress Report , 1997, NIPS.

[19]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[20]  J. Hampton Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[21]  J. Hampton,et al.  Disjunction of natural concepts , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Robert F. Bordley Quantum Mechanical and Human Violations of Compound Probability Principles: Toward a Generalized Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle , 1998, Oper. Res..

[23]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  An operatorial approach to stock markets , 2006, 0904.0896.

[24]  Dominic Widdows,et al.  Orthogonal Negation in Vector Spaces for Modelling Word-Meanings and Document Retrieval , 2003, ACL.

[25]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[26]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[27]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence , 2003, quant-ph/0309022.

[28]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[30]  B. Baaquie Quantum Finance: Path Integrals and Hamiltonians for Options and Interest Rates , 2004 .

[31]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  From Changes in the World to Changes in the Words: Lexical Adaptation , 2004, quant-ph/0407150.

[32]  S. Peters,et al.  Word Vectors and Quantum Logic Experiments with negation and disjunction , 2003 .

[33]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism , 2002, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[34]  J. Hampton Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[35]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[36]  A. Hibbs QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter , 1986 .

[37]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Conceptual Combination with Prototype Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  J. Hampton,et al.  Conjuctions of visually based categories: overextension and compensation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  The geometry of information retrieval , 2004 .

[40]  J. Hampton Conceptual combination , 2003 .

[41]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Gradedness and conceptual combination , 1982, Cognition.

[42]  G. Murphy,et al.  Feature Availability in Conceptual Combination , 1992 .

[43]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[44]  Peter Bruza,et al.  Quantum Logic of Semantic Space: An Exploratory Investigation of Context Effects in Practical Reasoning , 2005, We Will Show Them!.

[45]  E. Rosch ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[46]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[47]  Edward W. Piotrowski,et al.  An Invitation to Quantum Game Theory , 2002, ArXiv.

[48]  Iven Mechelen,et al.  Dominance and noncommutativity effects in concept conjunctions: Extensional or intensional basis? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA , 2002 .

[50]  Dominic Widdows,et al.  Geometry and Meaning , 2004, Computational Linguistics.

[51]  Martin Schaden A Quantum Approach to Stock Price Fluctuations , 2003 .