General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial

Many criminologists doubt that the dosage of uniformed police patrol causes any measurable difference in crime. This article reports a one-year randomized trial in Minneapolis of increases in patrol dosage at 55 of 110 crime “hot spots,” monitored by 7,542 hours of systematic observations. The experimental group received, on average, twice as much observed patrol presence, although the ratio displayed wide seasonal fluctuation. Reductions in total crime calls ranged from 6 percent to 13 percent. Observed disorder was only half as prevalent in experimental as in control hot spots. We conclude that substantial increases in police patrol presence can indeed cause modest reductions in crime and more impressive reductions in disorder within high crime locations.

[1]  Jan M. Chaiken,et al.  The Impact of Police Activity on Subway Crime , 1974 .

[2]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  DOES PATROL PREVENT CRIME?: THE MINNEAPOLIS HOT SPOTS EXPERIMENT. , 1995 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  J. Schnelle,et al.  Patrol evaluation research: a multiple-baseline analysis of saturation police patrolling during day and night hours. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[6]  Christopher S. Koper,et al.  Just enough police presence: Reducing crime and disorderly behavior by optimizing patrol time in crime hot spots , 1995 .

[7]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  WHAT HAPPENED TO PATROL OPERATIONS IN KANSAS CITY? A REVIEW OF THE KANSAS CITY PREVENTIVE PATROL EXPERIMENT' , 1975 .

[8]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Disorder and Decline , 2015 .

[9]  L. Sherman.  Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[10]  B. Levin,et al.  Effect of crossover on the statistical power of randomized studies. , 1989, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[12]  H. Fielding,et al.  An enquiry into the causes of the late increase of robbers and related writings , 2013 .

[13]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice , 1983, Crime and Justice.

[14]  L. Green,et al.  Cleaning up drug hot spots in Oakland, California: The displacement and diffusion effects , 1995 .

[15]  S. James Press,et al.  Some Effects of an Increase in Police Manpower in the 20th Precinct of New York City , 1971 .

[16]  R. Clarke,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CRIME DISPLACEMENT: AN APPLICATION OF RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY , 1987 .

[17]  G. Kelling,et al.  A response to “what happened to patrol operations in Kansas City?” , 1975 .

[18]  Ken Pease,et al.  Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection , 1990, Crime and Justice.

[19]  John T. Galvin,et al.  A city in terror : 1919, the Boston police strike , 1976 .

[20]  David Weisburd,et al.  Measuring immediate spatial displacement : Methodological issues and problems , 1995 .

[21]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Policing Communities: What Works? , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[22]  T C Chalmers,et al.  The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.