Communicating with the public: opportunities and rewards for individual ecologists

Many ecologists are interested in communicating science to the public and addressing societal concerns about environmental issues. Individual ecologists need to consider whether, when, and how this should be done. We propose that public outreach activities can be beneficial for ecologists at all stages of their career. There are diverse opportunities for such involvement, and these can vary enormously in terms of time and expertise required. Trends within the science of ecology, especially research focused on social-ecological systems, are likely to promote increased interactions with stakeholders and policy makers. To be effective in these interactions, ecologists should consider new approaches to communication and be aware of the potential roles scientists can play in public policy debates. Professional ecologists need to engage with non-scientific audiences; a review of such activities should be included in considerations for promotion, recognition, and awards, while also acknowledging variations in the inclinations and abilities of individual scientists. There are, however, few current standards for how much time ecologists should commit to public outreach, how time allocation might change over a career, or how to evaluate the quality of such activities. We ask ecologists to consider ways to evaluate the quality of interactions with the public and how to reward these efforts appropriately.

[1]  Amy J. Burgin,et al.  Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society , 2010 .

[2]  Peter Cullen,et al.  The turbulent boundary between water science and water management , 1990 .

[3]  D. Grossman,et al.  A Scientist's Guide To Talking With The Media: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists , 2006 .

[4]  J. Lubchenco Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[5]  Indira V. Samarasekera Universities need a new social contract , 2009, Nature.

[6]  D. Lach,et al.  Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study , 2003 .

[7]  Ronald E. Doel,et al.  :The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2008 .

[8]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[9]  J. Kaiser Ecologists on a Mission to Save the World , 2000, Science.

[10]  J. Britt Holbrook,et al.  Assessing the science-society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion , 2005 .

[11]  J. R. Weber,et al.  The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? , 2001 .

[12]  K. Burchell,et al.  Public culture as professional science: final report of the ScoPE project (Scientists on public engagement: from communication to deliberation?) , 2009 .

[13]  J. Pielke The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[14]  John P. Holdren,et al.  Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being , 2008, Science.

[15]  P. Vitousek Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change , 1994 .

[16]  R. Andersen,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers , 1991 .

[17]  M. Bucchi,et al.  Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology , 2008 .

[18]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement , 2009 .

[19]  W. Michael Kemp,et al.  The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse : Gene E. Likens. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 3, Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany, 1992, 166 pp., US $33.50, DM 59.00, ISSN 0932 2205 , 1995 .

[20]  Val H. Smith,et al.  Cultural Eutrophication of Inland, Estuarine, and Coastal Waters , 1998 .

[21]  Michael L. Pace,et al.  Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science , 1998, Springer New York.

[22]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[23]  G. A. Bradshaw,et al.  Conservation Ecology: Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap , 2008 .

[24]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Overcoming barriers to effective public communication of ecology , 2006 .

[25]  D. P. Macmynowski,et al.  Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science , 2007 .

[26]  M. Pace,et al.  In a Nutshell: Ecological Science and Sustainability for the 21st Century Reviews Reviews Reviews , 2022 .

[27]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[28]  R. Pouyat Communicating science on Capitol Hill: a case for embedded ecologists , 2007 .

[29]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[30]  Planetary Stewardship, with an Introduction from the Editor‐in‐Chief , 2010 .

[31]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  D. McKnight Overcoming “ecophobia”: fostering environmental empathy through narrative in children's science literature , 2010 .

[33]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[34]  E. McNie Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[35]  G. Woodwell,et al.  DDT Residues in an East Coast Estuary: A Case of Biological Concentration of a Persistent Insecticide , 1967, Science.

[36]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Humans as components of ecosystems : the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas , 1993 .

[37]  J. R. Price,et al.  Looking to the future , 1976, Nature.

[38]  William F. Laurance,et al.  After “eco” comes “service” , 2009 .

[39]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  The role of science in decision making: does evidence‐based science drive environmental policy? , 2010 .

[40]  Robert J. Whittaker,et al.  Scientists and the media: the struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science , 2005 .

[41]  James H. Cowan,et al.  The ecosystem approach: Its use and abuse , 1993 .

[42]  B. Moss,et al.  Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Problem Solving: Concepts and Case Studies. , 1987 .

[43]  J. Gregory,et al.  Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility , 2000 .

[44]  D. Sarewitz How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[45]  A. Kinzig Bridging Disciplinary Divides to Address Environmental and Intellectual Challenges , 2001, Ecosystems.

[46]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  The Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: An Ecological Research Agenda: A Report from the Ecological Society of America , 1991 .

[47]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .