Skull Mechanics Study of PI Procedure Plan for Craniosynostosis Correction Based on Finite Element Method

The main purpose of correction craniosynostosis is to reopen cranial sutures with some bone slots in order to free the skull transformation with the brain development from the closed craniums. The intent of this paper is to analysis the relationship between the shapes of bone slots and the skull rigidity. Finite element method is utilized to obtain the stress distribution and deformation clouds of the different surgery schemes. And then a best cranial suture bone slot's shape is brought up according to the stress distribution simulation results. Methods: A Congenital craniosynostosis case is selected to design the surgery treatment plan. PI-shape craniosynostosis correction scheme is used, and bone slots used for reconstruction the cranial suture are in variance to simulate the stress distribution change after the slots shape change. The cranial bone and endocranium models are meshed as tetrahedron element for finite element analysis. For the instantaneous stress take into account when the slots shape change, the viscoelastic material properties of the crianial bone and endocranium are ignored here. Abaqus is used to calculate the stress result. Results: Different bone slot shapes induce different cranium stress distribution and skull rigidity. Appropriate bone slots as the new cranial suture can make the cranium to win the maximum stress value about 46.12Mpa and the maximum displacement about 10.25mm. Conclusion: The results of stress distribution and deformation of cranial bone under the intracranial pressure after the correction craniosynostosis operation can be obtained by the finite element method. These results reflect the ability of the cranial bone expanding with the brain tissues growth. With finite element method, surgical prediction can be made to guide surgeons to make the decision of improving surgical treatment.

[1]  Raviraj Adhikari,et al.  Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Biofidelic child head FE model to simulate real world trauma , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[3]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Skull reconstruction planning transfer to the operation room by thin metallic templates: clinical results. , 2008, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[4]  Hsuan-Yu Chou,et al.  Predictions of bone remodeling around dental implant systems. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. Murray,et al.  Sagittal synostosis: a review of 53 cases of sagittal suturectomy in one unit. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[6]  Gang Wang,et al.  [Skull plasty to correct congenital craniosynostosis]. , 2007, Zhonghua zheng xing wai ke za zhi = Zhonghua zhengxing waike zazhi = Chinese journal of plastic surgery.

[7]  Yue Xian Viscoelastic Finite-element Analysis of Human Skull and Duramater with the Changing Intracranial Pressure , 2007 .

[8]  David Taylor,et al.  Mechanisms of short crack growth at constant stress in bone. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[9]  Leigh Ann Perkins,et al.  Endoscopic-assisted repair of craniosynostosis. , 2005, Neurosurgical focus.

[10]  Wolfgang Mühlbauer,et al.  Early operation in craniofacial dysostosis , 1989, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  C. Rimnac,et al.  Cortical bone tissue resists fatigue fracture by deceleration and arrest of microcrack growth. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W. Chadduck,et al.  Outcome analysis of 85 patients undergoing the pi procedure for correction of sagittal synostosis. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  A. Harders,et al.  Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  G. Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of craniofacial deformity using computed tomography. , 1983, Neurosurgery.

[15]  M. Edgerton,et al.  Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.