Physiology-based phenology models for forest tree species in Germany

Abstract Models of phenology are needed for the projection of effects of a changing climate on, for example, forest production, species competition, vegetation–atmosphere feedback and public health. A new phenology model for deciduous tree bud burst is developed and parameters are determined for a wide geographical range (Germany) and several forest tree species. The new model is based on considerations of simple interactions between inhibitory and promotory agents that are assumed to control the developmental status of a plant. Several alternative model structures were formulated emphasizing different hypothetical physiological processes. The new models fitted the observations better than classical models. The bias of the classical models, i.e. overestimation of early observations and underestimation of late observations, could be reduced but not completely removed. Differences in the best-fitting model equations for each species indicated that, for the late spring phases (bud burst of Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur), the photoperiod played a more dominant role than for early spring phases (bud burst of Betula pendula and Aesculus hippocastanum). Chilling only plays a subordinate role for spring bud burst compared to temperatures preceding this event in our data. The presented modeling approach allowed for a species-specific weighting of the dominant processes. The model results are in accordance with experimental findings that indicate an important role of day length in late spring BB. Potentials for model improvement are discussed.

[1]  T. Perry Dormancy of Trees in Winter , 1971, Science.

[2]  A. Vegis Dormancy in Higher Plants , 1964 .

[3]  J. William Munger,et al.  Exchange of Carbon Dioxide by a Deciduous Forest: Response to Interannual Climate Variability , 1996, Science.

[4]  M. Cannell,et al.  Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming , 1989 .

[5]  M. Cannell,et al.  Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis , 1983 .

[6]  J. Worrall Temperature Effects on Bud-Burst and Leaf-Fall in Subalpine Larch , 1993 .

[7]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Apple Fruit Bud Development and Growth; Analysis and an Empirical Model , 1974 .

[8]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Plant and Crop Process , 1985 .

[9]  P. Wareing,et al.  Photoperiodism in Woody Plants , 1956 .

[10]  K. Kramer Modelling comparison to evaluate the importance of phenology for the effects of climate change on growth of temperate-zone deciduous trees , 1995 .

[11]  M. Hannerz Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce , 1999 .

[12]  O. M. Heide,et al.  Daylength and thermal time responses of budburst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees. , 1993, Physiologia plantarum.

[13]  M. Diekmann Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden , 1996 .

[14]  P. Hari,et al.  Methods for combining phenological time series: application to bud burst in birch (Betula pendula) in Central Finland for the period 1896-1955. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[15]  P. Wareing,et al.  Hormones and Dormancy , 1971 .

[16]  I. Leinonen,et al.  The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[17]  Jen-Yu Wang,et al.  A Critique of the Heat Unit Approach to Plant Response Studies , 1960 .

[18]  J. Schaber Phenology in Germany in the 20th century : methods, analyses and models , 2002 .

[19]  L. Ingber Very fast simulated re-annealing , 1989 .

[20]  Harry Smith,et al.  THE CHEMICAL REGULATION OF THE DORMANCY PHASES OF BUD DEVELOPMENT , 1964 .

[21]  Koen Kramer,et al.  Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica , 1994 .

[22]  J. W. Hanover Control of Tree Growth , 1980 .

[23]  T. A. Black,et al.  Effects of climatic variability on the annual carbon sequestration by a boreal aspen forest , 1999 .

[24]  P. Hari,et al.  Improving the reliability of a combined phenological time series by analyzing observation quality. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[25]  L. Powell Hormonal Aspects of Bud and Seed Dormancy in Temperate-zone Woody Plants , 1987, HortScience.

[26]  Jörg Schaber,et al.  Evaluation of methods for the combination of phenological time series and outlier detection. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[27]  Heikki Hänninen,et al.  Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology , 1995 .

[28]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees , 1992 .

[29]  S. Silim,et al.  The role of plant growth regulators in dormancy in forest trees , 1987 .

[30]  O. M. Heide Dormancy release in beech buds (Fagus sylvatica) requires both chilling and long days , 1993 .

[31]  R. M. Samish Dormancy in Woody Plants , 1954 .

[32]  Denis-Didier Rousseau,et al.  Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperate‐zone trees using simulated annealing , 1998 .

[33]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[34]  G. Robertson A biometeorological time scale for a cereal crop involving day and night temperatures and photoperiod , 1968 .

[35]  P. Hari,et al.  Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula spp. under climatic warming: a comparison of two models. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[36]  A. Hense,et al.  Spatial modelling of phenological observations to analyse their interannual variations in Germany , 2002 .