Do Labor Market Policies Have Displacement Effects? Evidence from a Clustered Randomized Experiment

This paper reports the results from a randomized experiment designed to evaluate the direct and indirect (displacement) impacts of job placement assistance on the labor market outcomes of young, educated job seekers in France. We use a two-step design. In the first step, the proportions of job seekers to be assigned to treatment (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100%) were randomly drawn for each of the 235 labor markets (e.g. cities) participating in the experiment. Then, in each labor market, eligible job seekers were randomly assigned to the treatment, following this proportion. After eight months, eligible, unemployed youths who were assigned to the program were significantly more likely to have found a stable job than those who were not. But these gains are transitory, and they appear to have come partly at the expense of eligible workers who did not benefit from the program, particularly in labor markets where they compete mainly with other educated workers, and in weak labor markets. Overall, the program seems to have had very little net benefits.

[1]  D. Rubin.  [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[2]  A. Atkinson.  Income maintenance and social insurance , 1987 .

[3]  M. Gurgand,et al.  Private and Public Provision of Counseling to Job-Seekers: Evidence from a Large Controlled Experiment , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Pascal Michaillat.  APPENDIX TO : “ Do Matching Frictions Explain Unemployment ? Not in Bad Times . ” , 2016 .

[5]  P. Dolton,et al.  The Long‐Run Effects of Unemployment Monitoring and Work‐Search Programs: Experimental Evidence from the United Kingdom , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[6]  Jochen Kluve.  The Effectiveness of European Active Labor Market Policy , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Thomas Le Barbanchon,et al.  Les expérimentations d'accompagnement renforcé de l'Unédic et de l'ANPE : contenu des accompagnements et opinion des bénéficiaires , 2009 .

[8]  D. Rubin.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test Comment , 1980 .

[9]  Bruno Van der Linden,et al.  Equilibrium evaluation of active labor market programmes enhancing matching effectiveness , 2005 .

[10]  B. Klaauw,et al.  Counseling and Monitoring of Unemployed Workers: Theory and Evidence from a Controlled Social Experiment , 2001 .

[11]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1994 .

[12]  Amy N. Finkelstein.  The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from the Introduction of Medicare , 2007 .

[13]  David Card,et al.  ACTIVE LABOUR MARKET POLICY EVALUATIONS , 2010 .

[14]  C. A. Pissarides,et al.  Equilibrium Unemployment Theory , 1990 .

[15]  M. Angelucci,et al.  Indirect Effects of an Aid Program: How Do Cash Transfers Affect Ineligibles' Consumption? , 2009 .

[16]  M. Dahlberg,et al.  Direct Displacement Effects of Labour Market Programmes , 2005 .

[17]  D. Basu.  Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[18]  Bruce D. Meyer.  Lessons from the U.S. Unemployment Insurance Experiments , 1995 .

[19]  M. Rosholm.  Experimental Evidence on the Nature of the Danish Employment Miracle , 2008 .

[20]  Peter Dolton,et al.  Unemployment Duration and the Restart Effect: Some Experimental Evidence , 1996 .

[21]  R. Blundell,et al.  Evaluating the Employment Impact of a Mandatory Job Search Programme , 2003 .

[22]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  Active Labor Market Policy Effects for Women in Europe: A Survey , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  E. Duflo,et al.  The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment , 2002 .

[24]  S. Divay.  Nouveaux opérateurs privés du service public de l'emploi: les pratiques des conseillers sont-elles novatrices? , 2009 .

[25]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1995 .

[26]  Lars Wiethaus,et al.  RWI: Discussion Papers , 2003 .

[27]  Amanda Pallais.  Ineffiient Hiring in Entry-Level Labor Markets , 2012 .

[28]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Human Capital Formation and General Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tax and Tuition Policy , 2005 .

[29]  Sylvie BlascoMichael Rosholm.  Long-term impact of active labour market policy: evidence from a social experiment in Denmark , 2010 .

[30]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Equilibrium Policy Experiments and the Evaluation of Social Programs , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  G. Stephan,et al.  Is contracting-out intensified placement services more effective than in-house production? Evidence from a randomized field experiment , 2011 .

[32]  M. Gurgand,et al.  Is Counseling Welfare Recipients Cost-Effective ? Lessons from a Random Experiment , 2013 .

[33]  Gerard J. van den Berg,et al.  Treatment Evaluation in the Case of Interactions within Markets , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  L. Behaghel,et al.  Evaluation d'impact de l'accompagnement des demandeurs d'emploi par les Opérateurs privés de placement et le programme Cap vers l'entreprise. Rapport intermédiaire , 2008 .

[35]  P. Cahuc,et al.  Labor Market Policy Evaluation in Equilibrium: Some Lessons of the Job Search and Matching Model , 2010 .

[36]  Active Labor Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  R. Hall,et al.  A Theory of the Natural Unemployment Rate and the Duration of Employment , 1978 .

[38]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Optimal Unemployment Insurance Over the Business Cycle , 2010 .