Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots

This article uses transcriptions from video recordings of airline pilots at work, on actual flights, to consider some locations and the interactional significance of a feature of routine talk in the airline cockpit: and-prefaced turns. As pilots’ work is formally organized for them as many discrete and ordered tasks, and-prefacing is a local means for maintaining an ongoing sense of their conduct of a flight as a whole. By and-prefacing their talk, pilots present some new talk or task as connected and relevantly next in a larger macro-sequence of work for their flight. And-prefacing is evidence of pilots’ orientation to a sense of sequence that can extend well beyond pairs of turns at talk and/or non-talk activities, or even a series of such paired sequences. It allows pilots to make salient the sequentiality of their work where the officially prescribed wordings they must use can leave this implicit.

[1]  Alec McHoul,et al.  How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods , 2002 .

[2]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen,et al.  Prosody in conversation : interactional studies , 1996 .

[3]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[4]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis , 2005 .

[5]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions , 2003 .

[6]  Interaction and grammar: Introduction , 1996 .

[7]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  The language of turn and sequence , 2002 .

[8]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[9]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[10]  J. Sexton,et al.  Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload. , 2000, Human performance in extreme environments : the journal of the Society for Human Performance in Extreme Environments.

[11]  R. Kent Jones Miscommunication between pilots and air traffic control , 2003 .

[12]  Margaret H. Szymanski Re-engaging and dis-engaging talk in activity , 1999, Language in Society.

[13]  Richard Harper,et al.  "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting": Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control , 1993 .

[14]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications , 1998 .

[15]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  `Oh', Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments , 2001 .

[16]  Deborah Schiffrin,et al.  Functions of and in discourse , 1986 .

[17]  John H Eritage,et al.  Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry , 1998, Language in Society.

[18]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  The Cockpit as Multiple Activity System: A Computational Model for Understanding Situated Team Performance , 2003 .

[19]  J. M. Atkinson,et al.  Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings , 1980 .

[20]  Steven Cushing,et al.  Fatal Words: Communication Clashes and Aircraft Crashes , 1994 .

[21]  Paul ten Have,et al.  Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide , 1999 .

[22]  M. Sorjonen Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design , 1994, Language in Society.

[23]  L. Resnick,et al.  Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition , 1997 .

[24]  Christian Heath,et al.  Broadcast Talk: Initiating Calls Through a Computer-Mediated Technology , 2002 .

[25]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[26]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[27]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[28]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[29]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Anatomy of a system accident: the crash of Avianca Flight 052. , 1994, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[30]  Andrei Popescu-Belis,et al.  What are discourse markers ? , 2003 .

[31]  Joy Kreeft Peyton,et al.  Language in action : new studies of language in society : essays in honor of Roger W. Shuy , 2000 .

[32]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin Prosody in conversation: Informings and announcements in their environment: prosody within a multi-activity work setting , 1996 .

[33]  Ulrike Sköries,et al.  Features of a blame type using and: An analysis of an example☆ , 1998 .

[34]  P. Drew,et al.  Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. , 1994 .

[35]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes , 1996 .

[36]  C. Heath,et al.  Technology in Action: ‘Interaction’ with computers in architecture , 2000 .

[37]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims About Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing , 2004 .

[38]  C. Linde The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse , 1988, Language in Society.

[39]  D. Schiffrin Discourse markers: Frontmatter , 1987 .

[40]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[41]  E. Hutchins,et al.  Constructing Meaning from Space, Gesture, and Speech , 1997 .

[42]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Seeing as a Situated Activity: Formulating Planes* , 1996 .

[43]  G. Watson,et al.  Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology , 1991 .

[44]  H. Mazeland,et al.  Dutch 'BUT' as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker , 2004 .

[45]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit , 1996 .

[46]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit , 2002 .

[47]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[48]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Nonroutine Transactions in Controller-Pilot Communication. , 1994 .

[49]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Beyond the Black Box: Talk-In-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit , 2004 .

[50]  Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen,et al.  Studies in Interactional Linguistics , 2001 .

[51]  John Local,et al.  Getting back to prior talk: and-uh (m)as a back-connecting device in British and American English , 2004 .