Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

PurposeTo identify and evaluate the evidence for the pivot shift test as an outcome measure following ACL reconstruction. Achieving rotatory control of the knee post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been shown to increase patient satisfaction, decrease functional instability and potentially delay the development of osteoarthritis. The pivot shift is able to assess this rotatory component of knee laxity and appears to have the potential to become a benchmark in gauging the success of ACL surgery. Multiple confounding factors and discrepancies in performing the maneuver itself however put its usefulness in question. Thus, the literature was reviewed to assess whether the pivot shift was able to correlate with final functional outcomes.MethodsTwo reviewers searched two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) for randomized control trials that involved anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the last 5 years. All non-clinical studies were excluded. A quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Jadad scale by a reviewer. The number of studies using the Pivot Shift Test as well as the test’s relationship with functional outcome was evaluated.ResultsThe literature search yielded 274 studies, of which 65 papers were included. The average Jadad quality score for papers reporting pivot shift as an outcome measure was 2.4, with the most frequent score being 3. Forty seven of 65 studies described the Pivot Shift Test as an outcome measure following ACL reconstruction. Of the 47 studies that included pivot shift as an outcome measure, 40 (85%) correlated with the final functional outcomes.ConclusionThe pivot shift test is an important test following ACL reconstruction, and it correlates with functional outcomes.

[1]  S. Kakar,et al.  Prospective Comparison of Auto and Allograft Hamstring Tendon Constructs for ACL Reconstruction , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  M. Marcacci,et al.  ST/G ACL reconstruction: double strand plus extra‐articular sling vs double bundle, randomized study at 3‐year follow‐up , 2008, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[3]  G. Myhr,et al.  A prospective randomized study of ACL-reconstructions using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  Masataka Deie,et al.  Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Can Improve Rotational Stability , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J. Kartus,et al.  Patellar Tendon or Semitendinosus Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Xavier Tomas,et al.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the horizontal femoral position: a prospective, randomized study , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  E. Roos,et al.  Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  T. Järvelä Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[11]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone–patellar–tendon–bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  R. Burchette,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  A. Pearle,et al.  The pivot shift. , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[14]  Jon Karlsson,et al.  Biodegradable and Metallic Interference Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Raine Sihvonen,et al.  Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts and Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Fixation , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  A. K. Aune,et al.  No Difference in Knee Function or Prevalence of Osteoarthritis after Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with 4-Strand Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon—Bone Autograft , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  P. Jokl,et al.  Implications of the Pivot Shift in the ACL-Deficient Knee , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  A. De Carli,et al.  Minimizing internal rotation strength deficit after use of semitendinosus for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a modified harvesting technique. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[19]  Radek Hart,et al.  Outcomes after conventional versus computer-navigated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  K. Boyd,et al.  Bioabsorbable versus titanium interference screws with hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  K. Sakuraba,et al.  The effect of initial graft tension on postoperative clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon. , 2006, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[22]  Jonas Ranstam,et al.  A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  G. Apic,et al.  Differences in the Placement of the Tibial Tunnel during Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with and without Computer-Assisted Navigation , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  A Laupacis,et al.  Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[25]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-Year follow-up. , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  A. Kosiyatrakul,et al.  Clinical comparison between six-strand hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[27]  William I. Sterett,et al.  Relationships between Objective Assessment of Ligament Stability and Subjective Assessment of Symptoms and Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Quadrupled Hamstrings and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  David M. Freccero,et al.  Postoperative Range of Motion following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autograft Hamstrings , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[30]  Anne Benjaminse,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. , 2006, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[31]  F. Hamido,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring double bundle graft compared with single bundle procedures. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Chondromalacia and chronic anterior instabilities of the knee , 1991, American Journal of Sports Medicine.

[33]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[34]  B. F. Morrey,et al.  A Long-Term, Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Biodegradable and Metal Interference Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: Radiographic Results and Clinical Outcome , 2011 .

[35]  R. Siebold,et al.  Effect of compaction drilling during ACL reconstruction with hamstrings on postoperative tunnel widening , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[36]  Jinzhong Zhao,et al.  Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[37]  K. Sun,et al.  ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and irradiated fresh frozen allograft , 2009, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[38]  B. F. Morrey,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Navigation: A Comparative Study on 60 Patients , 2007 .

[39]  A. Moisala,et al.  Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[40]  H. Lill,et al.  Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction—a preliminary report , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[41]  Kenji Hara,et al.  A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[42]  K. Sun,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[43]  J. Stoney,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of endobutton versus cross‐pin femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2‐year follow‐up , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.

[44]  G. Papachristou,et al.  Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with Δ plasty: an innovative approach with hamstrings’ transfer and double tibial tunnel , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[45]  J. Sandelin,et al.  Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[46]  L. Salmon,et al.  A 10‐year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[47]  B. F. Morrey,et al.  Prospective Clinical Comparisons of Anatomic Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures in 328 Consecutive Patients , 2009 .

[48]  T. Matsushita,et al.  Comparison of the clinical outcome of double-bundle, anteromedial single-bundle, and posterolateral single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with minimum 2-year follow-up. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[49]  Y. K. Park,et al.  Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[50]  J. Sandelin,et al.  A Prospective Comparison of 3 Hamstring ACL Fixation Devices—Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix—Randomized into 4 Groups with 2 Years of Follow-Up , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[51]  A. Anand,et al.  A comparison of early and delayed arthroscopically-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring autograft. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[52]  H. Tohyama,et al.  Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[53]  V. Denaro,et al.  No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study. , 2008, The Knee.

[54]  Eugene Kim,et al.  Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[55]  Holger Schmitt,et al.  Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[56]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Determinants of Patient Satisfaction with Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[57]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Single-bundle patellar tendon versus non-anatomical double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study at 8-year minimum follow-up , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[58]  Claus Fink Jepsen,et al.  Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[59]  H. Jonsson,et al.  Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[60]  S. O'Donnell,et al.  A pilot clinical evaluation comparing the Mitek bone-tendon-bone cross pin and bioabsorbable screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation, a randomized double blind controlled trial. , 2008, The Knee.

[61]  T. Strand,et al.  Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[62]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[63]  T. Matsushita,et al.  A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[64]  D. Stengel,et al.  Bioresorbable Pins and Interference Screws for Fixation of Hamstring Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[65]  Y. Ao,et al.  Clinical evaluation of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective, randomized and controlled study. , 2009, Chinese medical journal.

[66]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2006 .

[67]  L. Good,et al.  Long‐term results after primary repair or non‐surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a randomized study with a 15‐year follow‐up , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[68]  R. B. Smith,et al.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament surgery: results of autogenous patellar tendon graft versus the Leeds-Keio synthetic graft five year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled trial. , 2010, The Knee.

[69]  A. Strahovnik The effect of graft choice on functional outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reply to comments by Cebesoy and Subasi , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[70]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in alterations in gait variability. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[71]  S. Song,et al.  Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[72]  Kang Sun,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[73]  R. Komadina,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[74]  Tomonori Yagi,et al.  Prospective Clinical Comparisons of Anatomic Double-Bundle versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures in 328 Consecutive Patients , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[75]  I. Benareau,et al.  Comparative study of knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without fluoroscopic assistance: a prospective study of 73 cases , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[76]  Rainer Siebold,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.