Stress polishing of thin shells for adaptive secondary mirrors. Application to the Very Large Telescope deformable secondary

Context. Adaptive secondary mirrors (ASM) are, or will be, key components on all modern telescopes, providing improved seeing conditions or diffraction limited images, thanks to the high-order atmospheric turbulence correction obtained by controlling the shape of a thin mirror. Their development is a key milestone towards future extremely large telescopes (ELT) where this technology is mandatory for successful observations. Aims. The key point of actual adaptive secondaries technology is the thin glass mirror that acts as a deformable membrane, often aspheric. On 6 m−8 m class telescopes, these are typically 1 m-class with a 2 mm thickness. The optical quality of this shell must be sufficiently good not to degrade the correction, meaning that high spatial frequency errors must be avoided. The innovative method presented here aims at generating aspherical shapes by elastic bending to reach high optical qualities. Methods. This method is called stress polishing and allows generating aspherical optics of a large amplitude with a simple spherical polishing with a full sized lap applied on a warped blank. The main advantage of this technique is the smooth optical quality obtained, free of high spatial frequency ripples as they are classically caused by subaperture toolmarks. After describing the manufacturing process we developed, our analytical calculations lead to a preliminary definition of the geometry of the blank, which allows a precise bending of the substrate. The finite element analysis (FEA) can be performed to refine this geometry by using an iterative method with a criterion based on the power spectral density of the displacement map of the optical surface. Results. Considering the specific case of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) deformable secondary mirror (DSM), extensive FEA were performed for the optimisation of the geometry. Results are showing that the warping will not introduce surface errors higher than 0.3 nm rms on the minimal spatial scale considered on the mirror. Simulations of the flattening operation of the shell also demonstrate that the actuators system is able to correct manufacturing surface errors coming from the warping of the blank with a residual error lower than 8 nm rms.

[1]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[2]  E Everhart Making corrector plates by Schmidt's vacuum method. , 1966, Applied optics.

[3]  G. Lemaître New procedure for making schmidt corrector plates. , 1972, Applied optics.

[4]  J. Nelson,et al.  Stressed mirror polishing. 1: A technique for producing nonaxisymmetric mirrors. , 1979, Applied optics.

[5]  G. Tondello,et al.  Toroidal grating obtained on an elastic substrate. , 1981, Applied optics.

[6]  Lothar Noethe,et al.  Active Optics: I. A System for Optimizing the Optical Quality and Reducing the Costs of Large Telescopes , 1987 .

[7]  Oberto Citterio,et al.  Active optics. II. Results of an experiment with a thin 1 m test mirror. , 1988 .

[8]  R. N. Wilson Active optics and the new technology telescope (NTT): The key to improved optical quality at lower cost in large astronomical telescopes , 1991 .

[9]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Current trends in optics , 1994 .

[10]  Raymond N. Wilson Reflecting Telescope Optics I , 1996 .

[11]  M. Ferrari Development of a variable curvature mirror for the delay lines of the VLT interferometer , 1998 .

[12]  Raymond N. Wilson,et al.  Reflecting Telescope Optics II , 1999 .

[13]  James H. Burge,et al.  Optical fabrication of the MMT adaptive secondary mirror , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[14]  James Roger P. Angel,et al.  Atmospheric tomography with Rayleigh laser beacons for correction of wide fields and 30-m-class telescopes , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[15]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  MMT-AO: two years of operation with the first adaptive secondary , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[16]  K. Dohlen,et al.  Active optics and modified-Rumsey wide-field telescopes: MINITRUST demonstrators with vase- and tulip-form mirrors. , 2005, Applied optics.

[17]  E. Prieto,et al.  On the performance of ELT instrumentation , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[18]  A. Riccardi,et al.  Deformable secondary mirrors for the LBT adaptive optics system , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  A deformable secondary mirror for the VLT , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  Fitting error analysis for the VLT deformable secondary mirror , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[21]  Russell B. Makidon,et al.  Temporal Evolution of Coronagraphic Dynamic Range and Constraints on Companions to Vega , 2006, astro-ph/0609337.

[22]  J. Spyromilio,et al.  The European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) , 2007 .

[23]  C. Aime,et al.  Speckle Noise and Dynamic Range in Coronagraphic Images , 2007, 0706.1739.

[24]  G. Lemaitre,et al.  Astronomical Optics and Elasticity Theory: Active Optics Methods , 2008 .

[25]  Emmanuel Hugot,et al.  Active optics: single actuator principle and angular thickness distribution for astigmatism compensation by elasticity. , 2008, Applied optics.

[26]  Kjetil Dohlen,et al.  Active Optics: stress polishing of toric mirrors for the VLT SPHERE adaptive optics system. , 2009, Applied optics.