Use of viber app: a fast, easy and cost effective method of communication in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE Neurosurgeons often have to rely on judgments of junior staffs to decide on patients whom they cannot attend immediately. Viber is a free to use application for image transfer on Internet. We evaluated the use of viber in neurosurgical scenario, to show it is cheap, fast, accessible, reliable and feasible. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective study from March 2013 to July 2013. Residents were taught to take sharp pictures and upload them immediately using viber on Internet. Primary endpoints were discordance between opinion of residents and consultants on viber images and subsequent actual image evaluation and time delay in decision-making. Discordance was considered significant if it changed management decision. RESULTS During the study period, 120 (mean age: 42 years, 58% males) patients were enrolled. Wi-Fi is freely available in the institute and thus no costs were involved. Decision could be made on images received on viber at an average of 20 min. There was discordance in 56.7% cases between residents' reports and images on viber, which was significant in 88.2% cases. However in 5% cases decision changed after actual images were reviewed. Of all imaging modalities, computed tomography angiographic images were associated with statistically significant discordance (P <0.05). CONCLUSION This study suggests that the use of viber app in neurosurgery can be an easy fast reliable and almost free mode of communicating images enabling a quick decision. However this cost-effective method should be used with caution particularly with imaging modalities, which require processing and review on console.

[1]  M. Levitt,et al.  Accuracy of interpretation of cranial computed tomography scans in an emergency medicine residency program. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  R A Novelline,et al.  Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. , 1998, Radiology.

[3]  G. Arendts,et al.  Cranial CT interpretation by senior emergency department staff. , 2003, Australasian radiology.

[4]  J Piek,et al.  Image transfer by mobile phones in neurosurgery. , 2006, Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie.

[5]  Adam M Licurse,et al.  Interpretation of head CT scans in the emergency department by fellows versus general staff non-neuroradiologists: a closer look at the effectiveness of a quality control program , 2007, Emergency Radiology.

[6]  Ivan Ng,et al.  Multimedia Messaging Service teleradiology in the provision of emergency neurosurgery services. , 2007, Surgical neurology.

[7]  Vicknes Waran,et al.  Video clip transfer of radiological images using a mobile telephone in emergency neurosurgical consultations (3G Multi-Media Messaging Service) , 2012, British journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  M. Heckelmann,et al.  Using smart phone video to supplement communication of radiology imaging in a neurosurgical unit: technical note , 2012, Neurological research.

[9]  S. Friedman,et al.  Clinical impact of diagnostic imaging discrepancy by radiology trainees in an urban teaching hospital emergency department , 2013, International Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[10]  M. Daly,et al.  Smart consultation for musculoskeletal trauma: accuracy of using smart phones for fracture diagnosis. , 2014, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.