Measuring Tissue Perfusion During Pressure Relief Maneuvers: Insights Into Preventing Pressure Ulcers

Abstract Background/Objective: To study the effect on tissue perfusion of relieving interface pressure using standard wheelchair pushups compared with a mechanical automated dynamic pressure relief system. Design: Repeated measures in 2 protocols on 3 groups of subjects. Participants: Twenty individuals with motor-complete paraplegia below T4, 20 with motor-complete tetraplegia, and 20 able-bodied subjects. Methods: Two 1-hour sitting protocols: dynamic protocol, sitting configuration alternated every 10 minutes between a normal sitting configuration and an off-loading configuration; wheelchair pushup protocol, normal sitting configuration with standard wheelchair pushup once every 20 minutes. Main Outcome Measures: Transcutaneous partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide measured from buttock overlying the ischial tuberosity and interface pressure measured at the seat back and buttocks. Perfusion deterioration and recovery times were calculated during changes in interface pressures. Results: In the off-loading configuration, concentrated interface pressure during the normal sitting configuration was significantly diminished, and tissue perfusion was significantly improved. Wheelchair pushups showed complete relief of interface pressure but incomplete recovery of tissue perfusion. Conclusions: Interface pressure analysis does not provide complete information about the effectiveness of pressure relief maneuvers. Measures of tissue perfusion may help establish more effective strategies. Relief achieved by standard wheelchair pushups may not be sufficient to recover tissue perfusion compromised during sitting; alternate maneuvers may be necessary. The dynamic seating system provided effective pressure relief with sustained reduction in interface pressure adequate for complete recovery of tissue perfusion. Differences in perfusion recovery times between subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) and controls raise questions about the importance of changes in vascular responses to pressure after SCI.

[1]  S V Fisher,et al.  Long term pressure recordings under the ischial tuberosities of tetraplegics , 1983, Paraplegia.

[2]  E Trefler,et al.  The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  WALTER 0. SEILER,et al.  Skin Oxygen Tension As a Function of Imposed Skin Pressure: Implication for Decubitus Ulcer Formation , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  A. Jackson,et al.  Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  M J Coggrave,et al.  A specialist seating assessment clinic: changing pressure relief practice , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[6]  D L Bader,et al.  Transcutaneous Gas Tensions in the Sacrum during the Acute Phase of Spinal Cord Injury , 1992, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  J. Barbenel Pressure management , 1991, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  D L Bader,et al.  Establishing predictive indicators for the status of loaded soft tissues. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  R. Daniel,et al.  Etiologic factors in pressure sores: an experimental model. , 1981, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  N P Reddy,et al.  Biomechanics of a lymphatic vessel. , 1975, Blood vessels.

[11]  B. Klitzman,et al.  Multimodality Evaluation of Pressure Relief Surfaces , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  S V Rithalia,et al.  Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses. , 2000, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Kosiak,et al.  Etiology of decubitus ulcers. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  D L Bader,et al.  The recovery characteristics of soft tissues following repeated loading. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  S. Garber,et al.  Pressure ulcers in community-resident persons with spinal cord injury: prevalence and risk factors. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R. Allman Epidemiology of pressure sores in different populations. , 1989, Decubitus.

[17]  L. Bennett,et al.  Skin blood flow in seated geriatric patients. , 1981, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Maria Lindén,et al.  Evaluation of antidecubitus mattresses , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  S M Dinsdale,et al.  Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. , 1974, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[20]  G A Ksander,et al.  An In‐Depth Look at Pressure Sores Using Monolithic Silicon Pressure Sensors , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  Brandstater Me,et al.  Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury , 1994 .

[22]  F. Cervo,et al.  Pressure ulcers. Analysis of guidelines for treatment and management. , 2000, Geriatrics.

[23]  Dinsdale Sm,et al.  Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Brandstater,et al.  Efficacy of three measures to relieve pressure in seated persons with spinal cord injury. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  W A Bauman,et al.  Transcutaneous oxygen tension in subjects with tetraplegia with and without pressure ulcers: a preliminary report. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  V. Falanga Chronic wounds: pathophysiologic and experimental considerations. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[27]  Mohsen Makhsous,et al.  Sitting with Adjustable Ischial and Back Supports: Biomechanical Changes , 2003, Spine.

[28]  Birmingham , 1906 .

[29]  R. Patterson,et al.  The impaired response of spinal cord injured individuals to repeated surface pressure loads. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  D L Bader,et al.  Early progressive changes in tissue viability in the seated spinal cord injured subject , 1995, Paraplegia.

[31]  J. Bleiberg,et al.  Wheelchair push-ups: measuring pressure relief frequency. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  J. Bakker,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[33]  DoubleTree Hotel Atlanta DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION NATIONAL CENTER FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL , 2006 .

[34]  G. H. Russ,et al.  Eliminating pressure: is less than 32 mmHg enough for wound healing? , 1991, Ostomy/wound management.

[35]  J. Reuler,et al.  The pressure sore: pathophysiology and principles of management. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[36]  Motta Gj,et al.  Eliminating pressure: is less than 32 mmHg enough for wound healing? , 1991 .

[37]  H. Stähelin,et al.  Decubitus Ulcer Prevention , 1983, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.