Photobiomodulation Reduces Periocular Wrinkle Volume by 30%: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate red and amber light-emitting diode protocols for facial rejuvenation at the same light dose. Background: The demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures to address skin aging has grown throughout the world. In vitro red and amber photobiomodulation (PBM) has been shown to improve collagen synthesis. Meanwhile, red PBM has already been studied in clinical trials; however, a comparison of the use of different wavelengths at the same light dose to reduce periocular wrinkles has not yet been performed. Methods: This split-face, randomized clinical trial recruited 137 women (40-65 years old) presenting with skin phototypes II-IV and Glogau photoaging scale types II-IV. The individuals received 10 sessions for 4 weeks of red (660 nm) and amber (590 nm) PBM (3.8 J/cm2), one at each side of the face. The outcomes, measured before and after the treatments, were the periocular wrinkle volume measured by VisioFace® RD equipment; hydration measured by the Corneometer CM 825; skin elasticity measured by the Cutometer Dual MPA 580; and quality of life determined by adapted versions of validated questionnaires [Melasma Quality of Life Scale-Brazilian Portuguese (MelasQoL-BP) and Skindex-29]. Results: There was a significant reduction in wrinkle volume after red (31.6%) and amber (29.9%) PBM. None of the treatments improved skin hydration and viscoelasticity. Both questionnaires showed improvements in participants' quality of life. Conclusions: PBM, both at red and amber wavelengths, is an effective tool for rejuvenation, producing a 30% wrinkle volume reduction. The technique has strong potential in patients with diabetes or those presenting with keloids, conditions for which highly inflammatory rejuvenating procedures are not indicated. Clinical trial registration number: REBEC-6YFCBM.

[1]  S. Tseng,et al.  Investigating the clinical implication of corneometer and mexameter readings towards objective, efficient evaluation of psoriasis vulgaris severity , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Marc Cohen,et al.  Home-based devices in dermatology: a systematic review of safety and efficacy , 2021, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[3]  J. Kwak,et al.  The Use of a Light-Emitting Diode Device for Neck Rejuvenation and Its Safety on Thyroid Glands , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  G. Glass Photobiomodulation: A review of the molecular evidence for low level light therapy. , 2020, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[5]  H. Miot,et al.  Validation of the Skindex-17 quality of life assessment instrument for a Brazilian population☆☆☆ , 2020, Anais brasileiros de dermatologia.

[6]  B. Kim,et al.  Synergistic effects of using novel home‐use 660‐ and 850‐nm light‐emitting diode mask in combination with hyaluronic acid ampoule on photoaged Asian skin: A prospective, controlled study , 2020, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[7]  D. Shin Various biological effects of solar radiation on skin and their mechanisms: implications for phototherapy , 2020, Animal cells and systems.

[8]  M. Nilforoushzadeh,et al.  Biometric changes of skin parameters in using of microneedling fractional radiofrequency for skin tightening and rejuvenation facial , 2020, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[9]  R. Liebano,et al.  Efficacy, safety, and guidelines of application of the fractional ablative laser erbium YAG 2940 nm and non-ablative laser erbium glass in rejuvenation, skin spots, and acne in different skin phototypes: a systematic review , 2020, Lasers in Medical Science.

[10]  F. Flament,et al.  Gender‐related differences in the facial aging of Caucasian French subjects and their relations with perceived ages and tiredness , 2020, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[11]  E. L. Carvalho,et al.  Measurement of skin hydration with a portable device (SkinUp® Beauty Device) and comparison with the Corneometer® , 2020, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[12]  P. Zarrintaj,et al.  Skin care and rejuvenation by cosmeceutical facial mask , 2018, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[13]  L. Baumann How to Use Oral and Topical Cosmeceuticals to Prevent and Treat Skin Aging. , 2018, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[14]  P. Humbert,et al.  Male versus female skin: What dermatologists and cosmeticians should know , 2018, International journal of women's dermatology.

[15]  A. Horliana,et al.  Efficacy of phototherapy to treat facial ageing when using a red versus an amber LED: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2018, BMJ Open.

[16]  L. Lilge,et al.  Skin color and tissue thickness effects on transmittance, reflectance, and skin temperature when using 635 and 808 nm lasers in low intensity therapeutics , 2018, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[17]  A. Mamalis,et al.  Light‐emitting diodes in dermatology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2018, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[18]  J. Crowther Understanding effects of topical ingredients on electrical measurement of skin hydration , 2016, International journal of cosmetic science.

[19]  S. Kim,et al.  Skin photorejuvenation effects of light‐emitting diodes (LEDs): a comparative study of yellow and red LEDs in vitro and in vivo , 2016, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[20]  R. G. Calderhead,et al.  Low Level Light Therapy with Light-Emitting Diodes for the Aging Face. , 2016, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[21]  Alessandra Haddad,et al.  Revista4Vol89ingles-_Layout 1 , 2014 .

[22]  Alexander Wunsch,et al.  A controlled trial to determine the efficacy of red and near-infrared light treatment in patient satisfaction, reduction of fine lines, wrinkles, skin roughness, and intradermal collagen density increase. , 2014, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[23]  H. Miot,et al.  Low‐dose oral isotretinoin versus topical retinoic acid for photoaging: a randomized, comparative study , 2014, International journal of dermatology.

[24]  Alessandra Haddad,et al.  Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures , 2013, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[25]  M. Chren The Skindex instruments to measure the effects of skin disease on quality of life. , 2012, Dermatologic clinics.

[26]  J. Na,et al.  Objective and non‐invasive evaluation of photorejuvenation effect with intense pulsed light treatment in Asian skin , 2011, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[27]  T. Gal,et al.  A Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Health‐Outcomes Survey of the Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections on Quality of Life and Self‐Esteem , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[28]  T. Karu,et al.  Mitochondrial mechanisms of photobiomodulation in context of new data about multiple roles of ATP. , 2010, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[29]  François A. Auger,et al.  Regulation of skin collagen metabolism in vitro using a pulsed 660 nm LED light source: clinical correlation with a single-blinded study. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  L. Donati,et al.  Non-invasive Peri-orbital Rejuvenation: Radiofrequency Dual Radiowave Energy Source (RF) and Light Emission Diode System (LED) , 2009, Orbit.

[31]  Ki-Ho Park,et al.  A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: clinical, profilometric, histologic, ultrastructural, and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settings. , 2007, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[32]  C. Whitehurst,et al.  A single-blinded randomised controlled study to determine the efficacy of Omnilux Revive facial treatment in skin rejuvenation , 2005, Lasers in Medical Science.

[33]  Kendric C. Smith,et al.  Laser (and LED) therapy is phototherapy. , 2005, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[34]  R. Geronemus,et al.  Clinical trial of a novel non‐thermal LED array for reversal of photoaging: Clinical, histologic, and surface profilometric results , 2005, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[35]  B A Russell,et al.  A study to determine the efficacy of combination LED light therapy (633 nm and 830 nm) in facial skin rejuvenation , 2005, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[36]  R. Cubeddu,et al.  In vivo absorption and scattering spectroscopy of biological tissues , 2003, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[37]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[38]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.