Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma.

BACKGROUND The combination melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) is considered a standard therapy for patients with myeloma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. However, emerging data on the use of lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone warrant a prospective comparison of the two approaches. METHODS We randomly assigned 1623 patients to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 28-day cycles until disease progression (535 patients), to the same combination for 72 weeks (18 cycles; 541 patients), or to MPT for 72 weeks (547 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus MPT. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 25.5 months with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone, 20.7 months with 18 cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and 21.2 months with MPT (hazard ratio for the risk of progression or death, 0.72 for continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. MPT and 0.70 for continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. 18 cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone was superior to MPT for all secondary efficacy end points, including overall survival (at the interim analysis). Overall survival at 4 years was 59% with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone, 56% with 18 cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and 51% with MPT. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were somewhat less frequent with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone than with MPT (70% vs. 78%). As compared with MPT, continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone was associated with fewer hematologic and neurologic toxic events, a moderate increase in infections, and fewer second primary hematologic cancers. CONCLUSIONS As compared with MPT, continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone given until disease progression was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival, with an overall survival benefit at the interim analysis, among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. (Funded by Intergroupe, Francophone du Myélome and Celgene; FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00689936; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number, 2007-004823-39.).

[1]  M. Beksac,et al.  Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Second primary malignancies with lenalidomide therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  G. Morgan,et al.  A review of second primary malignancy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide. , 2012, Blood.

[4]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  高橋 聡,et al.  Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0による胃癌術後合併症の解析 , 2006 .

[6]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  R. Fonseca,et al.  Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for global myeloma care , 2014, Leukemia.

[9]  G. Morgan,et al.  Myeloma management guidelines: a consensus report from the Scientific Advisors of the International Myeloma Foundation. , 2003, The hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association.

[10]  J. Miguel,et al.  Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  P. Fayers,et al.  Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. , 2011, Blood.

[12]  S. Mandrekar,et al.  Melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for elderly and/or transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis , 2011, Leukemia.

[13]  D L DeMets,et al.  Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Alessandro Corso,et al.  Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Long-term follow-up on overall survival from the MM-009 and MM-010 phase III trials of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma , 2009, Leukemia.

[17]  K. Owzar,et al.  Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Michael Wang,et al.  Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Vincenzo Callea,et al.  Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[22]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[23]  M. Gordon Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma , 2009 .

[24]  B. Pégourié,et al.  Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99–06): a randomised trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[25]  S. Pocock Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials , 1977 .

[26]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and improved survival. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  P. Fayers,et al.  Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. , 2010, Blood.

[28]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[29]  D. Esseltine,et al.  Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  R. Hájek,et al.  An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-MY20) in assessing the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[31]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Primary therapy of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) with weekly bortezomib, low-dose dexamethasone, and rituximab (BDR): long-term results of a phase 2 study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN). , 2013, Blood.

[32]  M. Beksac,et al.  Addition of thalidomide to oral melphalan/prednisone in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplantation: results of a randomized trial from the Turkish Myeloma Study Group , 2011, European journal of haematology.

[33]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  PFS2 In Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Results From The MM-015 Study , 2013 .

[34]  M. Beksac,et al.  International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[35]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. , 2011, Blood.

[36]  M. Boccadoro,et al.  Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Blood.

[37]  M. Dreyling,et al.  Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.