Classifying paintings by artistic genre: An analysis of features & classifiers

This paper describes an approach to automatically classify digital pictures of paintings by artistic genre. While the task of artistic classification is often entrusted to human experts, recent advances in machine learning and multimedia feature extraction has made this task easier to automate. Automatic classification is useful for organizing large digital collections, for automatic artistic recommendation, and even for mobile capture and identification by consumers. Our evaluation uses variableresolution painting data gathered across Internet sources rather than solely using professional high-resolution data. Consequently, we believe this solution better addresses the task of classifying consumer-quality digital captures than other existing approaches. We include a comparison to existing feature extraction and classification methods as well as an analysis of our own approach across classifiers and feature vectors.

[1]  Fazly Salleh Abas,et al.  Classification of painting cracks for content-based analysis , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Xin Zhao,et al.  Content-Based Identifying and Classifying Traditional Chinese Painting Images , 2008, 2008 Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[3]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A Short Introduction to Boosting , 1999 .

[4]  Franco Bartolini,et al.  Applications of image processing technologies to fine arts , 2003, SPIE Optical Metrology.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Texture modeling and synthesis using joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients , 1999 .

[6]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[7]  Daniel Keren,et al.  Painter identification using local features and naive Bayes , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[8]  Amit Kumar Das,et al.  CBIR using perception based texture and colour measures , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[9]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Eric Backer,et al.  Feature Selection for Paintings Classification by Optimal Tree Pruning , 2006, MRCS.

[11]  Paul H. Lewis,et al.  An integrated content and metadata based retrieval system for art , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Jialie Shen,et al.  Stochastic modeling western paintings for effective classification , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  H. Wölfflin Chapter Two. Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art , 2020, Baroque New Worlds.

[14]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Studying digital imagery of ancient paintings by mixtures of stochastic models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Robert Sablatnig,et al.  Identification of drawing tools by classification of textural and boundary features of strokes , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  Oguz Icoglu,et al.  Content-based access to art paintings , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[17]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Robert Sablatnig,et al.  Hierarchical classification of paintings using face- and brush stroke models , 1998, Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170).

[19]  Sung-Hyuk Cha,et al.  A graphical user interface for a fine-art painting image retrieval system , 2004, MIR '04.

[20]  Jens Alfredson,et al.  Is Woelfflin's system for characterizing art possible to validate by methods used in cognitive-based image-retrieval (CBIR)? , 2006, Electronic Imaging.