Plasma burn-through simulations using the DYON code and predictions for ITER

This paper will discuss simulations of the full ionization process (i.e. plasma burn-through), fundamental to creating high temperature plasma. By means of an applied electric field, the gas is partially ionized by the electron avalanche process. In order for the electron temperature to increase, the remaining neutrals need to be fully ionized in the plasma burn-through phase, as radiation is the main contribution to the electron power loss. The radiated power loss can be significantly affected by impurities resulting from interaction with the plasma facing components. The DYON code is a plasma burn-through simulator developed at Joint European Torus (JET) (Kim et al and EFDA-JET Contributors 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 103016, Kim, Sips and EFDA-JET Contributors 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 083024). The dynamic evolution of the plasma temperature and plasma densities including the impurity content is calculated in a self-consistent way using plasma wall interaction models. The recent installation of a beryllium wall at JET enabled validation of the plasma burn-through model in the presence of new, metallic plasma facing components. The simulation results of the plasma burn-through phase show a consistent good agreement against experiments at JET, and explain differences observed during plasma initiation with the old carbon plasma facing components. In the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), the allowable toroidal electric field is restricted to 0.35 (V m−1), which is significantly lower compared to the typical value (∼1 (V m−1)) used in the present devices. The limitation on toroidal electric field also reduces the range of other operation parameters during plasma formation in ITER. Thus, predictive simulations of plasma burn-through in ITER using validated model is of crucial importance. This paper provides an overview of the DYON code and the validation, together with new predictive simulations for ITER using the DYON code.

[1]  C. D. Warrick,et al.  ECRH-assisted start-up in ITER , 1996 .

[2]  T. Lunt,et al.  ECRH-assisted plasma start-up with toroidally inclined launch: multi-machine comparison and perspectives for ITER , 2011 .

[3]  A. A. Haasz,et al.  Isotopic effects in hydrocarbon formation due to low-energy H+/D+ impact on graphite , 1998 .

[4]  V. Belyakov,et al.  Plasma initiation stage analysis in tokamaks with TRANSMAK code , 2003 .

[5]  A. Sips,et al.  PSI effects on plasma burn-through in JET , 2013, 1306.6857.

[6]  K. Ikeda Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[7]  P. Noll,et al.  Start-up of the Ohmic Phase in JET , 1986 .

[8]  E. A. Lazarus,et al.  Low voltage Ohmic and electron cyclotron heating assisted startup in DIII-D , 1991 .

[9]  David Allan Humphreys,et al.  Chapter 8: Plasma operation and control , 2007 .

[10]  J. Reece Roth,et al.  Industrial Plasma Engineering : Volume 1: Principles , 1995 .

[11]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Characterisation of plasma breakdown at JET with a carbon and ITER-like wall , 2013 .

[12]  CurrentDrive,et al.  Chapter?8: Plasma operation and control , 1999 .

[13]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  ITER startup studies in the DIII-D tokamak , 2008 .

[14]  R. Neu,et al.  Long-term evolution of the impurity composition and impurity events with the ITER-like wall at JET , 2013 .

[15]  D. Mueller The physics of tokamak start-upa) , 2013 .

[16]  A. Sips,et al.  Physics of plasma burn-through and DYON simulations for the JET ITER-like wall , 2013, 1309.4890.

[17]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Understanding and predicting the dynamics of tokamak discharges during startup and rampdown , 2009 .

[18]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Overview of the JET ITER-like Wall Project , 2010 .

[19]  A. Sips,et al.  Enhancement of plasma burn-through simulation and validation in JET , 2012 .

[20]  M. N. A. Beurskens,et al.  JET ITER-like wall—overview and experimental programme , 2011 .