Hierarchical dictionary compressive sensing (HDCS) method in microwave induced thermal acoustic tomography

Abstract Aiming to reduce the reconstruction time and enhance the image quality of microwave induced thermal acoustic tomography (MITAT), a new image reconstruction method named HDCS-MITAT (HDCS: hierarchical dictionary compressive sensing) is proposed. Different from the recently demonstrated CS-MITAT (CS: compressive sensing) imaging method in which only one level dictionary is applied, hierarchical dictionaries are used in the HDCS-MITAT. In this method, the dictionaries with different spatial resolutions are constructed which constitute a hierarchical structure. During the image reconstructions, first the coarsest level dictionary is utilized to roughly estimate the position of the targets in the original image domain. A reduced interested image domain can be set based on this estimation. Then the next level dictionary which has higher resolution than the above level is applied to further estimating the position of the targets and so on. Finally, the finest level dictionary is used to reconstruct the image of the targets. Compared with the CS-MITAT, this HDCS-MITAT has much less computational time and better image quality. The effectiveness of the method has been validated through some simulations and real breast tumor experiments.

[1]  L V Wang,et al.  Microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography: reconstruction by synthetic aperture. , 2001, Medical physics.

[2]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Microwave-Induced Thermal Acoustic Tomography for Breast Tumor Based on Compressive Sensing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Time reversal and its application to tomography with diffracting sources. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[6]  Minghua Xu,et al.  Pulsed-microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography: filtered backprojection in a circular measurement configuration. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Near-field radiofrequency thermoacoustic tomography with impulse excitation. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  Jian Li,et al.  Multifrequency Microwave-Induced Thermal Acoustic Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  D. Xing,et al.  Ultrashort microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging: a breakthrough in excitation efficiency and spatial resolution. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  Andreas Spanias,et al.  Multilevel dictionary learning for sparse representation of images , 2011, 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE).

[11]  Da Xing,et al.  Thermoacoustic molecular tomography with magnetic nanoparticle contrast agents for targeted tumor detection. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  Michael E. Tipping Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Zongfu Yu,et al.  Measurement of time-dependent CP asymmetries in Bjavax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@6d610b0 → D(*)±π± decays and constraints on sin(2β + γ) , 2004 .

[14]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  S. Hagness,et al.  Toward contrast-enhanced microwave-induced thermoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: an experimental study of the effects of microbubbles on simple thermoacoustic targets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Signal Processing Education [President's Message] , 2007 .

[17]  L V Wang,et al.  Scanning microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography: signal, resolution, and contrast. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Witte,et al.  Spectroscopic thermoacoustic imaging of water and fat composition , 2012 .

[19]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[20]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[21]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Near-field thermoacoustic tomography of small animals , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Lihong Wang Scanning Microwave Induced Acoustic Tomography , 2002 .

[24]  Jarvis D. Haupt,et al.  Efficient adaptive compressive sensing using sparse hierarchical learned dictionaries , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[25]  D. Xing,et al.  Three-dimensional thermoacoustic imaging for early breast cancer detection. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  Shutao Li,et al.  Sparsity based denoising of spectral domain optical coherence tomography images , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[28]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.