Not All Bridging Ties Are Equal: Network Imprinting and Firm Growth in the Nashville Legal Industry, 1933-1978

In this paper we focus on the temporal and historical conditions under which bridging ties from the past affect current organizational outcomes. Whereas previous research has shown that bridging ties have high decay rates and short-term effects, we explore the possibility that bridging ties may produce benefits over an extended period of time. In particular, we contrast the conventional view of bridging ties having rapidly decaying effects with two alternative network dynamics suggesting “accumulating” and “imprinting” effects. We propose that bridging ties have accumulating effects as a result of learning and redeployment of cumulated knowledge. We also predict that bridging ties exhibit an imprinted effect whereby the founding conditions surrounding the formation of some, but not all, ties yield long-lasting network benefits. We test our theory in the context of Nashville's legal industry, studying the formation and evolution of the professional network of lawyers' coemployment ties between 1933 and 1978. Consistent with our theory, we find that bridging ties produce network benefits over an extended period of time and trace back to the point of tie formation. Surprisingly, we also find that the imprinted effect is more robust than the rapidly decaying effect of bridging ties.

[1]  Anne S. Miner.  Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition , 1993 .

[2]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[3]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[5]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  The Collegial Phenomenon : The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partn , 2001 .

[6]  Peter D. Sherer.  Leveraging Human Assets in Law Firms: Human Capital Structures and Organizational Capabilities , 1995 .

[7]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[8]  Damon J. Phillips.  The Promotion Paradox: Organizational Mortality and Employee Promotion Chances in Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–19961 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[10]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[11]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Jesper B. Sørensen.  STPIECE: Stata module to estimate piecewise-constant hazard rate models , 1999 .

[14]  M. Kenney.  Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[15]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[16]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[17]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[18]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  The Pressure of the Past: Network Imprinting in Intercorporate Communities , 2003 .

[19]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Kyungmook Lee,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN LARGE LAW FIRMS: A RESOURCE DEPENDENCY AND INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[21]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[22]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[23]  Jack Gourman.  The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities , 1996 .

[24]  Cynthia Fuchs Epstein,et al.  Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. , 1982 .

[25]  P. Ingram,et al.  Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[27]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[28]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Competition and Mutualism among Early Telephone Companies , 1987 .

[29]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market , 2004 .

[30]  Jesper B. Sørensen.  The Ecology of Organizational Demography: Managerial Tenure Distributions and Organizational Competition , 1999 .

[31]  Damon J. Phillips.  Organizational Genealogies and the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Case of Silicon Valley Law Firms , 2005 .

[32]  E. Lazega.  Introduction : Collegial Phenomenon : The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership , 2001 .

[33]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[34]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  A. Swaminathan.  Environmental Conditions at Founding and Organizational Mortality: A Trial-by-Fire Model , 1996 .

[36]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  BETTER WITH AGE? TIE LONGEVITY AND THE PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS OF BRIDGING AND CLOSURE. , 2008 .

[39]  Marc Galanter,et al.  Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm , 1991 .

[40]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[41]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[43]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[44]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[45]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[46]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Bridge decay , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[47]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, Vol. 1 , 1971 .

[48]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[49]  K. Immelmann.  Ecological Significance of Imprinting and Early Learning , 1975 .

[50]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[51]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[52]  E. Lazega.  The Collegial Phenomenon , 2001 .

[53]  Timothy Rowe.  Medical innovation. , 2011, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[54]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[55]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[56]  M. Diane Burton,et al.  Leaving a Legacy: Position Imprints and Successor Turnover in Young Firms , 2007 .

[57]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[58]  Toby E. Stuart.  A Structural Perspective on Organizational Innovation , 1999 .