Debating Technology for Dialogical Argument

Debating technologies, a newly emerging strand of research into computational technologies to support human debating, offer a powerful way of providing naturalistic, dialogue-based interaction with complex information spaces. The full potential of debating technologies for dialogical argument can, however, only be realized once key technical and engineering challenges are overcome, namely data structure, data availability, and interoperability between components. Our aim in this article is to show that the Argument Web, a vision for integrated, reusable, semantically rich resources connecting views, opinions, arguments, and debates online, offers a solution to these challenges. Through the use of a running example taken from the domain of citizen dialogue, we demonstrate for the first time that different Argument Web components focusing on sensemaking, engagement, and analytics can work in concert as a suite of debating technologies for rich, complex, dialogical argument.

[1]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[2]  Noam Slonim,et al.  Context Dependent Claim Detection , 2014, COLING.

[3]  S. Parsons,et al.  Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Paolo Torroni,et al.  Argumentation Mining , 2016, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[5]  Mitesh M. Khapra,et al.  Show Me Your Evidence - an Automatic Method for Context Dependent Evidence Detection , 2015, EMNLP.

[6]  Siddharth Jain,et al.  Determining leadership in contentious discussions , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW).

[7]  Chris Reed,et al.  Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[8]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  ConToVi: Multi‐Party Conversation Exploration using Topic‐Space Views , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[9]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Argumentation Mining: Where are we now, where do we want to be and how do we get there? , 2013, FIRE.

[10]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  A Corpus for Research on Deliberation and Debate , 2012, LREC.

[11]  Matthias Thimm,et al.  Tweety: A Comprehensive Collection of Java Libraries for Logical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Representation , 2014, KR.

[12]  Simon Wells,et al.  A domain specific language for describing diverse systems of dialogue , 2012, J. Appl. Log..

[13]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Neogotiation Through Argumentation - A Preliminary Report , 1996 .

[14]  Nikos I. Karacapilidis,et al.  The Zeno argumentation framework , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[15]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[16]  Chris Reed,et al.  AIF+: Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format , 2008, COMMA.

[17]  Hannes Strass,et al.  The DIAMOND System for Computing with Abstract Dialectical Frameworks , 2014, COMMA.

[18]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Speech Acts and Illocutionary Logic , 2005, Logic, Thought and Action.

[19]  David Stuart Robertson,et al.  Multi-agent Coordination as Distributed Logic Programming , 2004, ICLP.

[20]  Susan L. Epstein.  Wanted: Collaborative intelligence , 2015, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Benno Stein,et al.  Debating Technologies (Dagstuhl Seminar 15512) , 2015, Dagstuhl Reports.

[22]  Floris Bex,et al.  AIFdb: Infrastructure for the Argument Web , 2012, COMMA.

[23]  Floris Bex,et al.  Implementing the argument web , 2013, Commun. ACM.

[24]  Chris Reed,et al.  TOAST: Online ASPIC+ implementation , 2012, COMMA.

[25]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Human-agent collectives , 2014, CACM.

[26]  Christian Stab,et al.  Detecting Argument Components and Structures , 2015 .

[27]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Handbook of Argumentation Theory , 1987 .

[28]  Henry Prakken,et al.  On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format , 2013, J. Log. Comput..

[29]  Paul E. Dunne,et al.  Semi-stable semantics , 2006, J. Log. Comput..

[30]  Paolo Mancarella,et al.  Computing ideal sceptical argumentation , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[31]  Floris Bex,et al.  Interchanging arguments between Carneades and AIF , 2012, COMMA.

[32]  Gerard Vreeswijk,et al.  Abstract Argumentation Systems , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[33]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions , 2006, COMMA.

[34]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Logical dialogue-games and fallacies , 1984 .

[35]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Joint prediction in MST-style discourse parsing for argumentation mining , 2015, EMNLP.

[36]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  Towards Argument Mining from Dialogue , 2014, COMMA.

[37]  Simon Parsons,et al.  A Model for Integrating Dialogue and the Execution of Joint Plans , 2009, ArgMAS.

[38]  Anna De Liddo,et al.  Engaging Citizens with Televised Election Debates through Online Interactive Replays , 2015, TVX.

[39]  Manfred Stede,et al.  From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey , 2013, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[40]  Floris Bex,et al.  Dialogues on the Argument Web: Mixed Initiative Argumentation with Arvina , 2012, COMMA.

[41]  Archna Bhatia,et al.  A Corpus of Participant Roles in Contentious Discussions , 2014, LREC.

[42]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  New Ways of Deliberating Online: An Empirical Comparison of Network and Threaded Interfaces for Online Discussion , 2014, ePart.

[43]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[44]  Floris Bex,et al.  Generalising argument dialogue with the Dialogue Game Execution Platform , 2014, COMMA.

[45]  Karin Baier,et al.  The Uses Of Argument , 2016 .

[46]  Reedchris,et al.  Towards an argument interchange format , 2006 .

[47]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Defeasible Reasoning , 2020, Synthese Library.

[48]  Chris Reed,et al.  Argument Mining Using Argumentation Scheme Structures , 2016, COMMA.

[49]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .

[50]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[51]  O. Oha.  Fallacies , 2005 .

[52]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making , 2012 .

[53]  Chris Reed,et al.  Dialogue frames in agent communication , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[54]  Henry Prakken,et al.  An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments , 2010, Argument Comput..

[55]  Mark Klein,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Deliberation Using a Large-Scale Argumentation System: The Mit Collaboratorium , 2008 .

[56]  Christian Stab,et al.  Existing Resources for Debating Technologies , 2015 .

[57]  Chris Reed,et al.  Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication , 2004, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[58]  Floris Bex,et al.  Implementing ArguBlogging , 2012, COMMA.

[59]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[60]  C. Reed,et al.  Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation , 2010 .

[61]  Chris Reed,et al.  OVA+: an Argument Analysis Interface , 2014, COMMA.

[62]  Stefan Woltran,et al.  ASPARTIX: Implementing Argumentation Frameworks Using Answer-Set Programming , 2008, ICLP.

[63]  Christoph Weidenbach,et al.  Information from Deduction: Models and Proofs (Dagstuhl Seminar 15381) , 2015, Dagstuhl Reports.