use of sodium hypochlorite versus chlorexidine gluconate as an irrigating solution in endodontic treatment a literature review of the period from 2006 to 2016

Sodium hypochlorite is an irrigant solution widely used in chemotherapeutic treatment for a long time with great effectiveness. Gluconate chlorhexidine is a newer product but with excellent properties but there is still considerable controversy over which is the best product for the treatment of the canal. This study aims to identify through literature review using articles from 2006 to 1016 the use of sodium hypochlorite versus chlorhexidine gluconate as a solution Irrigator in endodontic treatment. Both gluconate chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite have great properties fundamental for endodontic treatment, neither of which can be disregarded. It is only necessary to analyze in detail when to use the hypochlorite or chlorhexidine that can be used alternately in the preparation of the endodontic canal, taking due care not to use them simultaneously because interaction between the two products provide a high toxicity. Hypochlorite may be used to initiate treatment and dissolution of pulp tissue and to terminate chlorhexidine treatment after pre-cleaning the hypochlorite removal canal, taking full advantage of the two products’ qualities for best results.

[1]  J. Marion chlorhexidine and its applications in Endodontics: a literature review , 2013 .

[2]  L. G. Vaz,et al.  Comparação entre soluções irrigadoras na endodontia: clorexidina x hipoclorito de sodio / Comparasion between irrigants solutions in endodontics: chlorhexidine x sodium hypocloride , 2011 .

[3]  Renata Pardini Hussne,et al.  COMPARAÇÃO DO USO DO HIPOCLORITO DE SÓDIO E DA CLOREXIDINA COMO SOLUÇÃO IRRIGADORA NO TRATAMENTO ENDODÔNTICO: REVISÃO DE LITERATURA , 2011 .

[4]  F. H. Seixas Avaliação histológica da limpeza dos canais radiculares promovida por diferentes métodos de irrigação e análise tomográfica da área apical no comprimento de trabalho , 2011 .

[5]  F. Montagner,et al.  Pulp tissue dissolution when the use of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA alone or associated , 2011 .

[6]  C. Albicans Antimicrobial activity of 2 % chlorhexidine gluconate , 1 % sodium hypochlorite and paramonochlorophenol combined with furacin against S . aureus , 2011 .

[7]  Maria Aparecida Nicoletti,et al.  O HIPOCLORITO DE SÓDIO NA ENDODONTIA , 2010 .

[8]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Antifungal efficacy of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 17% EDTA with and without an antifungal agent. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  Á. Borges,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1% sodium hypochlorite and paramonochlorophenol combined with furacin against S. aureus, C. albicans, E. faecalise and P. aureginosa , 2010 .

[10]  R. Sodhi,et al.  Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  Gilson Blitzkow Sydney,et al.  Clorexidina na terapia endodôntica , 2008 .

[12]  P. Bernabé,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS , 2008, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[13]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  B. Gomes,et al.  Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants. , 2007, Brazilian dental journal.

[15]  L. Grossman Irrigation of Root Canals , 1943 .

[16]  A. Walker A Definite and Dependable Therapy for Pulpless Teeth , 1936 .

[17]  E. D. Coolidge The Diagnosis and Treatment of Conditions Resulting from Diseased Dental Pulps , 1919 .

[18]  M. T. Barrett The Dakin-Carrel Antiseptic Solution , 1917, The Dental register.