Adult age differences in interference from a prospective-memory task: a diffusion model analysis

People often slow down their ongoing activities when they must remember an intended action, known as the cost or interference effect of prospective memory (PM). Only a few studies have examined adult age differences in PM interference, and the specific reasons underlying such differences are not well understood. The authors used a model-based approach to reveal processes underlying PM interference and age differences in these processes. Older and younger adults first performed a block of an ongoing lexical decision task alone. An embedded event-based PM task was added in a second block. Simultaneously accounting for the changes in response time distributions and error rates induced by the PM task, Ratcliff’s (Psychological Review 85:59–108, 1978) diffusion model was used to decompose the nonlinear combination of speed and accuracy into psychologically meaningful components. Remembering an intention not only reduced processing efficiency in both age groups, but also prolonged peripheral nondecision times and induced response cautiousness. Overall, the findings suggest that there are multiple, but qualitatively similar factors underlying PM task interference in both age groups.

[1]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  U. Bayen,et al.  What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory? , 2011, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[3]  Y. Chan,et al.  Increased prospective memory interference in normal and pathological aging: different roles of motor and verbal processing speed , 2013, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[4]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters , 2008 .

[5]  E. Maylor,et al.  Rejecting the dull hypothesis : the relation between method and theory in cognitive aging research , 2000 .

[6]  Melissa J. Guynn,et al.  A two‐process model of strategic monitoring in event‐based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking , 2003 .

[7]  U. Bayen,et al.  The source of adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a multinomial modeling approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Models of Cognitive Aging , 2000 .

[9]  Franz Petermann,et al.  Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (WIE). , 2007 .

[10]  M. Lee,et al.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[11]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Prospective Memory : Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives , 2007 .

[12]  Rebekah E. Smith The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[14]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE ) : Type article Title On the interpretation of removable interactions : a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus , 2012 .

[15]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: A multiprocess explanation , 2008 .

[16]  J. Henry,et al.  The age-prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms , 2010, International Psychogeriatrics.

[17]  Oliver Wilhelm,et al.  TBS-TK Rezensionen Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene WIE. Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung und Adaptation des WAIS-III von David Wechsler , 2010 .

[18]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[19]  Jan Rummel,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[21]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[22]  A. Voss,et al.  Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Nobuo Ohta,et al.  Biomarkers and memory aging: A life-course perspective , 2012 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.