The effects of genomic germline variant reclassification on clinical cancer care

The last two decades have provided an astounding amount of novel information about the human genome. Translating germline genomic data into clinically actionable findings is reliant on the annotation and laboratory classification of specific variants. Variant classification helps providers and patients determine if genomic findings can inform clinical management. In germline hereditary cancer predisposition testing, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are routinely misunderstood. By definition, they cannot be classified by the testing laboratory as either problematic mutations or benign variants. Many VUS undergo category reclassifications over time (from months to years after initial classification) as more information is known about normal human genomic diversity, especially among underrepresented minority populations. When VUS are reclassified, it has been shown that they are often downgraded. Likewise, some variants originally thought to be actionable mutations are downgraded to VUS or benign variants. Rarely but importantly, VUS may be reclassified in a manner that increases their initial clinical significance. Here, we discuss the insights gained from the study of variant reclassification. We provide a case series to highlight the potential impact that variant reclassifications can have on individual and family cancer management, risk counseling, and screening.

[1]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Prospective Study of Cancer Genetic Variants: Variation in Rate of Reclassification by Ancestry , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  S. Manley,et al.  Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing , 2018, JAMA.

[3]  C. Vnencak-Jones,et al.  The impact of variant classification on the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  S. Macklin,et al.  Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[5]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. Chen,et al.  Efficacy of the PARP Inhibitor Veliparib with Carboplatin or as a Single Agent in Patients with Germline BRCA1- or BRCA2-Associated Metastatic Breast Cancer: California Cancer Consortium Trial NCT01149083 , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Colin C Pritchard,et al.  Family-Specific Variants and the Limits of Human Genetics. , 2016, Trends in molecular medicine.

[8]  T. Slavin,et al.  When Clinical Care Depends on the Answer: The Challenges of Assessing Germline Cancer Gene Variants. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Vijai Joseph,et al.  Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Mark E. Robson,et al.  Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Abraham,et al.  Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[12]  T. Slavin,et al.  Clinical Application of Multigene Panels: Challenges of Next-Generation Counseling and Cancer Risk Management , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[13]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  J. Powers,et al.  Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing: The Third Case Series , 2014, Cancer journal.

[15]  W. Young,et al.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[16]  Deanna M. Church,et al.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  W. Otten,et al.  The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[18]  Joan Borràs,et al.  Early onset hereditary papillary renal carcinoma: germline missense mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the met proto-oncogene. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[19]  J. Weitzel,et al.  Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[20]  A. González Martín Progress in PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA mutant recurrent ovarian cancer? , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[21]  Antonio González Martín Progress in PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA mutant recurrent ovarian cancer , 2017 .

[22]  D. Brizel,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology , 2012 .