Wings of the butterfly : sunspot groups for 1826–2015

The spatio-temporal evolution of sunspot activity, the so-called Maunder butterfly diagram, has been continously available since 1874 using data from the Royal Greenwich Observatory, extended by SOON network data after 1976. Here we present a new extended butterfly diagram of sunspot group occurrence since 1826, using the recently digitized data from Schwabe (1826–1867) and Spörer (1866–1880). The wings of the diagram are separated using a recently developed method based on an analysis of long gaps in sunspot group occurrence in different latitude bands. We define characteristic latitudes, corresponding to the start, end, and the largest extent of the wings (the F, L, and H latitudes). The H latitudes (30◦–45◦) are highly significantly correlated with the strength of the wings (quantified by the total sum of the monthly numbers of sunspot groups). The F latitudes (20◦–30◦) depict a weak tendency, especially in the southern hemisphere, to follow the wing strength. The L latitudes (2◦–10◦) show no clear relation to the wing strength. Overall, stronger cycle wings tend to start at higher latitudes and have a greater wing extent. A strong (5–6)-cycle periodic oscillation is found in the start and end times of the wings and in the overlap and gaps between successive wings of one hemisphere. While the average wing overlap is zero in the southern hemisphere, it is two to three months in the north. A marginally significant oscillation of about ten solar cycles is found in the asymmetry of the L latitudes. The new long database of butterfly wings provides new observational constraints to solar dynamo models that discuss the spatio-temporal distribution of sunspot occurrence over the solar cycle and longer.

[1]  R. Arlt,et al.  Properties of sunspot cycles and hemispheric wings since the 19th century , 2016 .

[2]  J. Rozelot,et al.  Active Latitude Oscillations Observed on the Sun , 2016, 1604.00831.

[3]  S. Solanki,et al.  A New Calibrated Sunspot Group Series Since 1749: Statistics of Active Day Fractions , 2015, Solar Physics.

[4]  S. Solanki,et al.  Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7-10 , 2015, 1508.07849.

[5]  Astronomy,et al.  Digitization of sunspot drawings by Sp\"orer made in 1861-1894 , 2014, 1411.7790.

[6]  Edward W. Cliver,et al.  Revisiting the Sunspot Number , 2014, Space Science Reviews.

[7]  J. Vaquero,et al.  Sunspot Numbers and Areas from the Madrid Astronomical Observatory (1876 – 1986) , 2014, 1407.3104.

[8]  J. Vaquero,et al.  Revisiting the Sunspot Number , 2014, 1407.3231.

[9]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width: 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874 , 2014 .

[10]  R. Arlt,et al.  Sunspot positions and sizes for 1825–1867 from the observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe , 2013, 1305.7400.

[11]  R. Arlt The sunspot observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe , 2011, 1110.3620.

[12]  Jie Jiang,et al.  The solar magnetic field since 1700. II. Physical reconstruction of total, polar and open flux , 2011, 1102.1270.

[13]  I. Tuominen,et al.  Secular variation of hemispheric phase differences in the solar cycle , 2010, 1009.5889.

[14]  D. Hathaway The Solar Cycle , 2010, Living reviews in solar physics.

[15]  E. M. Roshchina,et al.  Comparison of three solar activity indices based on sunspot observations , 2009 .

[16]  J. Ballester,et al.  The periodic behaviour of the North-South asymmetry of sunspot areas revisited , 2005 .

[17]  J. Wang,et al.  Regularity of the north-south asymmetry of solar activity , 2002 .

[18]  A. Milsom,et al.  Note on the observed differences in spottedness of the Sun's northern and southern hemispheres , 1955 .

[19]  D. Sokoloff,et al.  Active longitudes, nonaxisymmetric dynamos and phase mixing , 2006 .

[20]  R. Arlt Solar Physics DOI: 10.1007/•••••-•••-•••-••••-• THE BUTTERFLY DIAGRAM IN THE 18TH CENTURY , 2022 .