Fundamental Limits in Confocal Microscopy

The previous chapter described how the confocal approach developed from conventional light microscopy and outlined the basic advantages gained by the use of confocal sampling techniques, primarily that the exclusion of light by the confocal pinhole makes it possible to record data from optical sections. This chapter will discuss the fundamental considerations that limit the performance of all confocal microscopes. Though at present no commercially available equipment approaches these limits, some simple tests will be described to help the user assess how well a given instrument performs. Additional information to help the user to operate the confocal microscope in an optimal manner can be found in Chapter 35, “ATutorial on Confocal Microscopy,” and Chapter 36, “Practical Confocal Microscopy.” These also include methods for measuring resolution and other useful parameters.

[1]  David R. Sandison,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Background Rejection and Optimization of Signal to Noise in Confocal Microscopy , 1994 .

[2]  W. Gunter,et al.  Optical devices to increase photocathode quantum efficiency. , 1970, Applied optics.

[3]  S Inoué,et al.  Image sharpness and contrast transfer in coherent confocal microscopy , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  J. E. Celis,et al.  Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook , 1997 .

[5]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Nanometer-scale motion analysis of microtubule-based motor enzymes , 1988 .

[6]  J. Pawley,et al.  The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[7]  Morley M. Blouke,et al.  CCDiode: an optimal detector for laser confocal microscopes , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  J. Pawley,et al.  Limitations on optical sectioning in live-cell confocal microscopy. , 2006, Scanning.

[9]  H. Pollack,et al.  Underground Records of Changing Climate , 1993 .

[10]  A. Rose,et al.  Television Pickup Tubes and the Problem of Vision , 1948 .

[11]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio in confocal microscope systems , 1992 .

[12]  W. Webb,et al.  Quantitative comparison of background rejection, signal-to-noise ratio, and resolution in confocal and full-field laser scanning microscopes. , 1995, Applied optics.

[13]  James B. Pawley,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – Sources of Noise in Three-Dimensional Microscopical Data Sets , 1994 .

[14]  Judy E. Trogadis,et al.  Three-dimensional confocal microscopy : volume investigation of biological specimens , 1994 .