Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.

Research has consistently shown memory is enhanced when learning combines test trials with study trials compared with study trials alone (i.e., testing effect). However, the majority of work on testing effects has involved undergraduate students. In the current experiment, the authors examined testing effects in 2 groups of elementary school children. First and 3rd graders learned 1 list of words in a test-plus-restudy condition and a 2nd list of words in a restudy condition. In addition to examining the benefits of testing in children, the authors examined possible explanations for the memorial benefits of testing that have received initial support in adult populations (Zaromb & Roediger, 2010). Results showed that the benefits of testing extend to elementary school children and that testing enhanced item-specific processing but not relational processing. Third graders were also aware of the memorial benefits of testing, whereas 1st graders were not. Most important, even 1st graders benefit from testing, in part because testing allows them to capitalize on their ability to process item-specific information.

[1]  M. Carr,et al.  Strategy Acquisition and Transfer Among American and German Children: Environmental Influences on Metacognitive Development , 1989 .

[2]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[3]  Arthur I. Gates,et al.  Recitation As a Factor in Memorizing , 1917 .

[4]  H. F. Spitzer.  Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[5]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[6]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  Tests enhance the transfer of learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Hélène Sauzéon,et al.  Developmental differences in explicit and implicit conceptual memory tests: A processing view account , 2012, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[8]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  A simple, intuitive method for computing confidence intervals in within-subject designs: Generalizing Loftus & Masson (1994) and avoiding biases of alternative accounts , 2012 .

[9]  Marcus Hasselhorn,et al.  Variable memory strategy use in children's adaptive intratask learning behavior: developmental changes and working memory influences in free recall. , 2007, Child development.

[10]  P. H. Miller,et al.  Instructing Children to Use Memory Strategies: Evidence of Utilization Deficiencies in Memory Training Studies , 1997 .

[11]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[12]  R. Bjork,et al.  Why Tests Appear to Prevent Forgetting: A Distribution-Based Bifurcation Model. , 2011 .

[13]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  How does knowledge promote memory? The distinctiveness theory of skilled memory. , 2008 .

[14]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Nate Kornell,et al.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting , 2007, The European journal of cognitive psychology.

[16]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Multiple Memory Systems Are Unnecessary to Account for Infant Memory Development: an Ecological Model Historical Perspective: Dichotomous Memory Systems , 2009 .

[17]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[18]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The Concept of Distinctiveness in Memory Research , 2012 .

[19]  Catherine O. Fritz,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice: An effective aid to preschool children's learning , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  William L. Cull,et al.  Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall , 2000 .

[21]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  M. Hasselhorn,et al.  Rehearsal dynamics in elementary school children. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  C. Varnhagen,et al.  Age and Schooling Effects in Story Recall and Story Production. , 1994 .

[24]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[25]  M. L. Howe,et al.  Proximate Mechanisms and the Development of Adaptive Memory , 2013 .

[26]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers' recall predictions. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  Marcus Hasselhorn,et al.  The dynamics of free recall and their relation to rehearsal between 8 and 10 years of age. , 2010, Child development.

[28]  W. Schneider,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in young children's use and maintenance of a selective memory strategy. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[29]  B. Ackerman.  Item-Specific and Relational Encoding Effects in Children's Recall and Recognition Memory for Words. , 1984 .

[30]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[32]  V. Reyna,et al.  Learning rate, learning opportunities, and the development of forgetting. , 1995 .

[33]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[34]  Priti Shah,et al.  Age- and Schooling-Related Effects on Executive Functions in Young Children: A Natural Experiment , 2008, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[35]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Why do some children benefit more from testing than others? Gist trace processing to explain the testing effect , 2011 .

[36]  R. Hunt.  Two contributions of distinctive processing to accurate memory , 2003 .

[37]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[39]  Amanda R. Lipko-Speed.  Can young children be more accurate predictors of their recall performance? , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[40]  M. Naus,et al.  Rehearsal and Organizational Processes in Children's Memory. , 1975 .

[41]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.