Implementing flexibility in automaticity: Evidence from context-specific implicit sequence learning

Attention is often dichotomized into controlled vs. automatic processing, where controlled processing is slow, flexible, and intentional, and automatic processing is fast, inflexible, and unintentional. In contrast to this strict dichotomy, there is mounting evidence for context-specific processes that are engaged rapidly yet are also flexible. In the present study we extend this idea to the domain of implicit learning to examine whether flexibility in automatic processes can be implemented through the reliance on contextual features. Across three experiments we show that participants can learn implicitly two complementary sequences that are associated with distinct contexts, and that transfer of learning when the two contexts are randomly intermixed depends on the distinctiveness of the two contexts. Our results point to the role of context-specific processes in the acquisition and expression of implicit sequence knowledge, and also suggest that episodic details can be represented in sequence knowledge.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[2]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Representing serial action and perception , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[4]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  A subjective unit formation account of implicit learning , 1997 .

[5]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Matthew J. C. Crump,et al.  The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Effector-related sequence learning in a bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task , 2008, Psychological research.

[9]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  E. Soetens,et al.  Sequence learning and sequential effects , 2004, Psychological research.

[11]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Integrated and independent learning of hand-related constituent sequences. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Randall K. Jamieson,et al.  Applying an Exemplar Model to the Artificial-Grammar Task: Inferring Grammaticality from Similarity , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  E. Soetens,et al.  The role of response selection in sequence learning , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[17]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Sequential congruency effects in implicit sequence learning , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[20]  Randall K. Jamieson,et al.  Applying an exemplar model to the serial reaction-time task: Anticipating from experience , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Peter A. Frensch,et al.  One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. , 1998 .

[23]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[25]  B. Milliken,et al.  On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning , 1993 .

[27]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). , 1991 .

[28]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[29]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Context dependent learning in the serial RT task , 2007, Psychological research.

[30]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[31]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[32]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details , 1998 .

[33]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[34]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Attention and probabilistic sequence learning , 1998 .

[35]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Perceptual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .

[38]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Effects of sequence length and structure on implicit serial learning , 1997 .

[39]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Temporal effects in sequence learning , 2003 .

[40]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .