Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones.

Context is important for recovering language information from talker-induced variability in acoustic signals. In tone perception, previous studies reported similar effects of speech and nonspeech contexts in Mandarin, supporting a general perceptual mechanism underlying tone normalization. However, no supportive evidence was obtained in Cantonese, also a tone language. Moreover, no study has compared speech and nonspeech contexts in the multi-talker condition, which is essential for exploring the normalization mechanism of inter-talker variability in speaking F0. The other question is whether a talker's full F0 range and mean F0 equally facilitate normalization. To answer these questions, this study examines the effects of four context conditions (speech/nonspeech × F0 contour/mean F0) in the multi-talker condition in Cantonese. Results show that raising and lowering the F0 of speech contexts change the perception of identical stimuli from mid level tone to low and high level tone, whereas nonspeech contexts only mildly increase the identification preference. It supports the speech-specific mechanism of tone normalization. Moreover, speech context with flattened F0 trajectory, which neutralizes cues of a talker's full F0 range, fails to facilitate normalization in some conditions, implying that a talker's mean F0 is less efficient for minimizing talker-induced lexical ambiguity in tone perception.

[1]  I. THE CHINESE LANGUAGE , 1947 .

[2]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[3]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[4]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  J. Leather,et al.  Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone , 1983 .

[6]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[7]  K. Garrett,et al.  An acoustic analysis of fluctuations in the voices of normal adult speakers across three times of day. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[9]  Neville H Fletcher,et al.  Vocal fold physiology: Controlling complexity and chaos , 1996 .

[10]  Robert S. Bauer,et al.  Modern Cantonese Phonology , 1997 .

[11]  P. Lieberman,et al.  Fundamental frequency of phonation and perceived emotional stress. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Corinne B. Moore,et al.  Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[14]  Speaker normalization in the perception of Cantonese level tones : effect of context-target pitch distance , 1998 .

[15]  Tan Lee,et al.  Spoken language resources for Cantonese speech processing , 2002, Speech Commun..

[16]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  D H Whalen,et al.  Perception of pitch location within a speaker's F0 range. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R Todd Constable,et al.  Differentiation of speech and nonspeech processing within primary auditory cortex. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L. Holt Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[21]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  L. Holt The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[24]  A. Lotto,et al.  Speech Perception Within an Auditory Cognitive Science Framework , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[25]  Chao-Yang Lee,et al.  Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: a perceptual and acoustic study. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Liang Tao,et al.  Speaker variability and context in the identification of fragmented Mandarin tones by native and non-native listeners , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[27]  L. Holt,et al.  General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  L. Holt,et al.  Evidence for the central origin of lexical tone normalization (L). , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Gang Peng,et al.  The effect of intertalker variations on acoustic-perceptual mapping in Cantonese and Mandarin tone systems. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.