Derivation of Soil‐Specific Streaming Potential Electrical Parameters from Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Partially Saturated Soils

Water movement in unsaturated soils gives rise to measurable electrical potential differences that are related to the flow direction and volumetric fluxes, as well as to the soil properties themselves. Laboratory and field data suggest that these so-called streaming potentials may be several orders of magnitudes larger than theoretical predictions that only consider the influence of the relative permeability and electrical conductivity on the self potential (SP) data. Recent work has improved predictions somewhat by considering how the volumetric excess charge in the pore space scales with the inverse of water saturation. We present a new theoretical approach that uses the flux-averaged excess charge, not the volumetric excess charge, to predict streaming potentials. We present relationships for how this effective excess charge varies with water saturation for typical soil properties using either the water retention or the relative permeability function. We find large differences between soil types and the predictions based on the relative permeability function display the best agreement with field data. The new relationships better explain laboratory data than previous work and allow us to predict the recorded magnitudes of the streaming potentials following a rainfall event in sandy loam, whereas previous models predict values that are three orders of magnitude too small. We suggest that the strong signals in unsaturated media can be used to gain information about fluxes (including very small ones related to film flow), but also to constrain the relative permeability function, the water retention curve, and the relative electrical conductivity function.

[1]  M. Jackson Multiphase electrokinetic coupling: Insights into the impact of fluid and charge distribution at the pore scale from a bundle of capillary tubes model , 2010 .

[2]  M. Voltz,et al.  Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self‐potential method , 2006 .

[3]  J. Vrugt,et al.  On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review , 2008 .

[4]  Pride,et al.  Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[5]  P. Leroy,et al.  Comparison of molecular dynamics simulations with triple layer and modified Gouy-Chapman models in a 0.1M NaCl-montmorillonite system. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[6]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .

[7]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Prediction of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity with electrical conductivity , 2009 .

[8]  Jörg Renner,et al.  Self‐potential signals induced by periodic pumping tests , 2008 .

[9]  P. Glover,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 1. Theory of the zeta potential , 1999 .

[10]  M. J. Vold Zeta potential in colloid science. Principles and applications , 1982 .

[11]  A. Revil,et al.  Electrical properties of zeolitized volcaniclastic materials , 2002 .

[12]  S. Finsterle,et al.  Electrokinetic coupling in unsaturated porous media. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  C. Doussan,et al.  Streaming current generation in two‐phase flow conditions , 2007 .

[14]  Frédéric Perrier,et al.  Characterization of Electrical Daily Variations Induced by Capillary Flow in the Non-saturated Zone , 2000 .

[15]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Estimation of field‐scale soil hydraulic and dielectric parameters through joint inversion of GPR and hydrological data , 2005 .

[16]  Po-zen Wong,et al.  Determination of rock properties by low‐frequency AC electrokinetics , 1999 .

[17]  David G. Toll,et al.  Field Measurement of Suction, Water Content, and Water Permeability , 2008 .

[18]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils , 2002 .

[19]  M. Jackson,et al.  Multiphase streaming potential in sandstones saturated with gas/brine and oil/brine during drainage and imbibition , 2011 .

[20]  A. Revil,et al.  Electrical burst signature of pore‐scale displacements , 2009 .

[21]  Frank Dale Morgan,et al.  Modeling of streaming potential responses caused by oil well pumping , 1994 .

[22]  A Revil,et al.  Introducing interacting diffuse layers in TLM calculations: a reappraisal of the influence of the pore size on the swelling pressure and the osmotic efficiency of compacted bentonites. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[23]  A. Revil,et al.  Constitutive equations for ionic transport in porous shales , 2004 .

[24]  C. Pain,et al.  A new numerical model of electrokinetic potential response during hydrocarbon recovery , 2006 .

[25]  A. Metson Methods of Chemical Analysis for Soil Survey Samples , 1957 .

[26]  R. Storie Methods of Chemical Analysis for Soil Survey Samples , 1957 .

[27]  J. H. Hedges,et al.  Part I -guidelines For Preparation Of Brine And Determination Of Brine Resistivity For Use In Electrical Resistivity Measurements; Sca Guidelines For Sample Preparation And Porosity Measurement Of Electrical Resistivity Samples , 1990 .

[28]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[29]  A. Revil,et al.  A mechanistic model for the spectral induced polarization of clay materials , 2009 .

[30]  Guy Marquis,et al.  Modelling streaming potential (SP) signals induced by water movement in the vadose zone , 2003 .

[31]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[32]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Electrical Resistivity in a Loamy Soil: Identification of the Appropriate Pedo‐Electrical Model , 2011 .

[33]  Niklas Linde,et al.  Self-potential investigations of a gravel bar in a restored river corridor , 2010 .

[34]  Y. Mualem,et al.  A MODIFIED DEPENDENT‐DOMAIN THEORY OF HYSTERESIS , 1984 .

[35]  W. R. Sill,et al.  Self-potential modeling from primary flows , 1983 .

[36]  M. R. Sheffer,et al.  Forward modelling and inversion of streaming potential for the interpretation of hydraulic conditions from self-potential data , 2007 .

[37]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Characterization of multiphase electrokinetic coupling using a bundle of capillary tubes model , 2008 .

[38]  Burke J. Minsley,et al.  Modeling and Inversion of Self Potential Data , 2007 .

[39]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[40]  André Revil,et al.  Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self‐potential measurements , 2007 .

[41]  Georges Vachaud,et al.  Field characterization of the relationship between electrical potential gradients and soil water flux , 1997 .

[42]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potentials of granular media: Influence of the Dukhin and Reynolds numbers , 2007 .

[43]  A. Revil,et al.  Characterization of transport properties of argillaceous sediments: Application to the Callovo‐Oxfordian argillite , 2005 .

[44]  S. Tamari,et al.  A simple method for determining soil hydraulic properties in the laboratory , 1993 .

[45]  L. Jouniaux,et al.  Streaming potential dependence on water-content in Fontainebleau sand , 2010 .

[46]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[47]  Laurence Jouniaux,et al.  Streaming potential of a sand column in partial saturation conditions , 2003 .

[48]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[49]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  Hysteresis in the electrical resistivity of partially saturated sandstones , 1991 .

[50]  N. Linde,et al.  Chemico-electromechanical coupling in microporous media. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[51]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity and Soil Salinity: New Formulations and Calibrations , 1989 .

[52]  M. Meju,et al.  Near-Surface Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Induction , 2005 .

[53]  E. Russell,et al.  Soil Physics , 1941, Nature.

[54]  A. Revil,et al.  A triple-layer model of the surface electrochemical properties of clay minerals. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[55]  G. Petiau Second Generation of Lead-lead Chloride Electrodes for Geophysical Applications , 2000 .

[56]  A. Revil,et al.  Hysteresis of the self‐potential response associated with harmonic pumping tests , 2008 .

[57]  H. Brand,et al.  Reply to Comment on , 1997 .

[58]  S. Friedman,et al.  Relationships between the Electrical and Hydrogeological Properties of Rocks and Soils , 2005 .

[59]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potentials in two‐phase flow conditions , 2004 .

[60]  M. H. Waxman,et al.  Electrical Conductivities in Oil-Bearing Shaly Sands , 1968 .

[61]  L. Jouniaux,et al.  Streaming potential dependence on water-content in Fontainebleau sand , 2010 .

[62]  Pascal Sailhac,et al.  Electrical Streaming Potential Measured at the Ground Surface: Forward Modeling and Inversion Issues for Monitoring Infiltration and Characterizing the Vadose Zone , 2004 .

[63]  G. Bourrié,et al.  Ionic contribution to the self-potential signals associated with a redox front. , 2009, Journal of contaminant hydrology.