A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge

This article proposes a theory of information need for information retrieval (IR). Information need traditionally denotes the start state for someone seeking information, which includes information search using an IR system. There are two perspectives on information need. The dominant, computer science perspective is that the user needs to find an answer to a well-defined question which is easy for the user to formulate into a query to the system. Ironically, information science's best known model of information need (Taylor, 1968) deems it to be a “black box”—unknowable and nonspecifiable by the user in a query to the information system. Information science has instead devoted itself to studying eight adjacent or surrogate concepts (information seeking, search and use; problem, problematic situation and task; sense making and evolutionary adaptation/information foraging). Based on an analysis of these eight adjacent/surrogate concepts, we create six testable propositions for a theory of information need. The central assumption of the theory is that while computer science sees IR as an information- or answer-finding system, focused on the user finding an answer, an information science or user-oriented theory of information need envisages a knowledge formulation/acquisition system. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Indexing and Access for Digital Libraries and the Internet: Human, Database, and Domain Factors , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Birger Hjørland.  The foundation of the concept of relevance , 2010 .

[3]  Ross J. Todd.  Back to our beginnings: information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Cuisine: Classification using stylistic feature sets and-or name-based feature sets , 2010 .

[5]  G. Wersig,et al.  Information science needs a theory of ‘information actions’ , 1985 .

[6]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Models in information behaviour research , 1999, J. Documentation.

[7]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part II. Results of a Design Study , 1982, J. Documentation.

[8]  Robert N. Oddy,et al.  INFORMATION RETRIEVAL THROUGH MAN‐MACHINE DIALOGUE , 1977 .

[9]  T. D. Wilson.  Review of: Cole, Charles Information need: a theory connecting information search to knowledge formation. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2012 , 2012, Inf. Res..

[10]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[11]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback , 1997 .

[12]  Yang Lin,et al.  Task-based information retrieval: Structuring undergraduate history essays for better course evaluation using essay-type visualizations , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Charles Cole,et al.  A socio-cognitive framework for designing interactive IR systems: Lessons from the Neanderthals , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Maurice B. Line.  The INFORMATION USES AND NEEDS OF SOCIAL SCIENTISTS: AN OVERVIEW OF INFROSS , 1971 .

[15]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[16]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Creativity and convergence in information science research: The roles of objectivity and subjectivity, constraint, and control , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  On user studies and information needs , 2006, J. Documentation.

[18]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Xuehua Shen,et al.  Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[20]  Andrew D. Madden,et al.  Evolution and information , 2004, J. Documentation.

[21]  Tefko Saracevic.  Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007 .

[22]  B. Dubrovsky.  Evolutionary psychiatry. Adaptationist and nonadaptationist conceptualizations , 2002, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  Charles Cole,et al.  The development of a diagnostic-prescriptive tool for undergraduates seeking information for a social science/humanities assignment. III. Enabling devices , 2000, Information Processing & Management.

[24]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[26]  Jeppe Nicolaisen.  Compromised need and the label effect: An examination of claims and evidence , 2009 .

[27]  B. C. Brookes.  The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects , 1980 .

[28]  Thomas D. Wilson,et al.  Human Information Behavior , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[29]  Andrew Large,et al.  Investigating the Anomalous States of Knowledge hypothesis in a real-life problem situation: A study of history and psychology undergraduates seeking information for a course essay: Research Articles , 2005 .

[30]  Robert S. Taylor.  Value-Added Processes in the Information Life Cycle , 1982, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Betsy Van der Veer Martens.  Biographical note—Robert S. Taylor , 1999 .

[32]  Charles Cole.  Operationalizing the notion of information as a subjective construct , 1994 .

[33]  C. Cole.  Information Acquisition in History Ph.d. Students: Inferencing and the Formation of Knowledge Structures , 1998, The Library Quarterly.

[34]  Charles Cole,et al.  Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: how experts add value , 2000 .