Fusion-based localization for a Heterogeneous camera network

Heterogeneous sensor networks (HSNs) are becoming more commonly used for purposes such as monitoring and surveillance, as they offer richer sources of data for situational awareness. An important aspect of HSNs is localization. In this paper, we describe a novel method for localizing a network of cameras equipped with wireless radios. Our method fuses both the image data and radio interferometry data in order to determine the position of the sensors and the orientation of each camerapsilas field of view. While existing methods that rely solely on image data alone are often limited in that they can only recover position up to scale factors, by fusing the image data and radio interferometry data, we are able to recover the position and orientation with no scale factor ambiguity. In contrast, localization of sensor nodes using radio alone only recovers the position of the sensors and often relies on computationally expensive methods. The method discussed in this paper exploits both the image and radio data for a more computationally efficient process of localization. We discuss both a linear and nonlinear approach to fusing the data which depend on different constraints on the network. We demonstrate our approach on a real network of camera and radio nodes.

[1]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  An Invitation to 3-D Vision , 2004 .

[2]  Lily Lee,et al.  Monitoring Activities from Multiple Video Streams: Establishing a Common Coordinate Frame , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Automatic Camera Network Localization using Object Image Tracks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  James Black,et al.  Multi view image surveillance and tracking , 2002, Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, 2002. Proceedings..

[5]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Traffic monitoring and accident detection at intersections , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[6]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  An Affine Invariant Salient Region Detector , 2004, ECCV.

[7]  Paola Mello,et al.  Image analysis and rule-based reasoning for a traffic monitoring system , 1999, Proceedings 199 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (Cat. No.99TH8383).

[8]  Oliver Otto,et al.  A review of telecollaboration technologies with respect to closely coupled collaboration , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[9]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative compariso , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Rita Cucchiara,et al.  A system for automatic face obscuration for privacy purposes , 2006 .

[11]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  ViewCast: view dissemination and management for multi-party 3d tele-immersive environments , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[12]  A. Ledeczi,et al.  Node-density independent localization , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[13]  Hyeokho Choi,et al.  Distributed camera network localization , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[14]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Simultaneous calibration and tracking with a network of non-overlapping sensors , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[15]  Rahul Sukthankar,et al.  Distributed localization of networked cameras , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[16]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[17]  Miklós Maróti,et al.  Radio interferometric geolocation , 2005, SenSys '05.

[18]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Data Association for Multi-Target Tracking , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Osama Masoud,et al.  The use of computer vision in monitoring weaving sections , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..