Cutting edge proteomics: benchmarking of six commercial trypsins.

Tryptic digestion is an important component of most proteomics experiments, and trypsin is available from many sources with a cost that varies by more than 1000-fold. This high-mass-accuracy LC-MS study benchmarks six commercially available trypsins with respect to autolytic species and sequence specificity. The analysis of autolysis products led to the identification of a number of contaminating proteins and the generation of a list of peptide species that will be present in tryptic digests. Intriguingly, many of the autolysis products were nontryptic peptides, specifically peptides generated by C-terminal cleavage at asparagine residues. Both porcine and bovine trypsins were demonstrated to be tyrosine O-sulfated. Using both a label-free and a tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling approach, a comparison of the digestion of a standard protein mixture using the six trypsins demonstrated that, apart from the least expensive bovine trypsin, the trypsins were equally specific. The semitryptic activity led to a better sequence coverage for abundant substrates at the expense of low-abundance species. The label-free analysis was shown to be more sensitive to unique features from the individual digests that were lost in the TMT-multiplexing study.

[1]  M. Mann,et al.  Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[2]  K. Gevaert,et al.  Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo , 2009, Nature Methods.

[3]  Jennifer A. Siepen,et al.  Prediction of missed cleavage sites in tryptic peptides aids protein identification in proteomics. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Cleavage specificities of the brother and sister proteases Lys-C and Lys-N. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[5]  Chunaram Choudhary,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Lysine Acetylation Suggests its Broad Regulatory Scope in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  M. Sahin-Tóth,et al.  Human cationic trypsinogen is sulfated on Tyr154 , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[7]  Henrik Molina,et al.  Is oxidized thioredoxin a major trigger for cysteine oxidation? Clues from a redox proteomics approach. , 2013, Antioxidants & redox signaling.

[8]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations , 2005, Nature Methods.

[9]  L. Briand,et al.  INFLUENCE OF G187W/K188F/D189Y MUTATION IN THE SUBSTRATE BINDING POCKET OF TRYPSIN ON β-CASEIN PROCESSING , 1998 .

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Trypsin Cleaves Exclusively C-terminal to Arginine and Lysine Residues*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  O. Itkonen,et al.  Mass spectrometric detection of tyrosine sulfation in human pancreatic trypsinogens, but not in tumor‐associated trypsinogen , 2008, The FEBS journal.

[12]  A. Pandey,et al.  Detection of tyrosine phosphorylated peptides by precursor ion scanning quadrupole TOF mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  J. Bunkenborg,et al.  Data extraction from proteomics raw data: an evaluation of nine tandem MS tools using a large Orbitrap data set. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[14]  D. H. Larsen,et al.  Site-specific Phosphorylation Dynamics of the Nuclear Proteome during the DNA Damage Response* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  Bryan J. Smith Enzymatic cleavage of proteins. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Does trypsin cut before proline? , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  Jakob Bunkenborg,et al.  The minotaur proteome: Avoiding cross‐species identifications deriving from bovine serum in cell culture models , 2010, Proteomics.

[18]  C. Murphy,et al.  Recognition of trypsin autolysis products by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. , 1990, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The Implications of Proteolytic Background for Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  R. Casey,et al.  Tryptic hydrolysis at asparagine residues in globin chains. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  M. Mann,et al.  Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[23]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Protein sulfation analysis--A primer. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  C. Craik,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence of Substrate Specificity within the Chymotrypsin-like Serine Protease Fold* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  M. Mann,et al.  Ultra High Resolution Linear Ion Trap Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Orbitrap Elite) Facilitates Top Down LC MS/MS and Versatile Peptide Fragmentation Modes* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative proteomics reveals subset-specific viral recognition in dendritic cells. , 2010, Immunity.

[27]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[29]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  J R Yates,et al.  Protein sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  W. Lehmann,et al.  Protein tyrosine-O-sulfation analysis by exhaustive product ion scanning with minimum collision offset in a NanoESI Q-TOF tandem mass spectrometer. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.